-
Comparative Study
The new measuring multimorbidity index predicted mortality better than Charlson and Elixhauser indices among the general population.
- James Stanley and Diana Sarfati.
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand; Biostatistical Group, University of Otago, Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand. Electronic address: james.stanley@otago.ac.nz.
- J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 1; 92: 99-110.
ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to develop and validate an updated morbidity index for short-term mortality risk, using chronic conditions identified from routine hospital admission ICD-10 data.Study Design And SettingRetrospective cohort study of all adult New Zealand (NZ) residents at January 1, 2012. Adult NZ residents aged 18 years and over, defined by enrollment with a Primary Healthcare Organisation or accessing public health care in preceding year. Data were split into two data sets for index development (70%, n = 2,331,645) and validation (30%, n = 1,000,166).ResultsThe M3 index was constructed using log hazard ratios for 1-year mortality modeled from presence of 61 chronic conditions. Validation results were improved for the M3 index for predicting 1-year mortality compared to Charlson and Elixhauser on the c-statistic (M3: 0.931, Charlson: 0.921, Elixhauser: 0.922; difference M3 vs. Charlson = 0.010, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.008, 0.012; M3 vs. Elixhauser = 0.009, 95% CI: 0.007, 0.012) and integrated discriminative improvement (M3 vs. Charlson = 0.024, 95% CI: 0.021, 0.026; M3 vs. Elixhauser = 0.024, 95% CI: 0.022, 0.027).ConclusionThe M3 index had improved predictive performance for 1-year mortality risk over Charlson and Elixhauser indices, allowing better adjustment for mortality risk from chronic conditions. This provides an important tool for population-level analyses of health outcomes.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.