-
Observational Study
High-flow humidified nasal preoxygenation in pregnant women: a prospective observational study.
- Tan P C F PCF Department of Anaesthesia, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, O J Millay, L Leeton, and A T Dennis.
- Department of Anaesthesia, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
- Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jan 1; 122 (1): 86-91.
BackgroundObstetric airway guidelines recommend preoxygenation in preparation for general anaesthesia to achieve end-tidal oxygen concentrations (etO2) of ≥90%, and mention the potential use of high-flow humidified nasal oxygen (HFNO). We investigated the new HFNO technique (Optiflow™) in term pregnant women.MethodsSeventy-three term participants underwent a 3 min HFNO protocol (30 L min-1 for 30 s, and then 50 L min-1 for 150 s). The etO2 was assessed for the first four breaths after simulated preoxygenation. The primary outcome was the proportion who achieved etO2 ≥90% for the first expired breath. The secondary outcomes were the proportion who achieved etO2 ≥80%; fetal heart rate before and after the test; the association of body mass index (BMI) to etO2 achieved with preoxygenation; and comfort levels of, and preference for, nasal and face mask preoxygenation.ResultsThe proportion with first expired breath etO2 ≥90% was 60% [95% confidence interval (CI): 54-66%] and etO2 ≥80% was 84% (95% CI: 80-88%). There was no change in fetal heart rate from before to after the test (P=0.34). There was a negative association of BMI to etO2 achieved with preoxygenation (Pearson correlation: -0.26; P=0.027). There was no difference in comfort scores between nasal cannula and face mask (P=0.40). Forty-one (56%; 95% CI: 35-47%) women preferred the nasal cannula to the face mask.ConclusionsHFNO using this protocol is inadequate to preoxygenate term pregnant women. Despite encouraging results in the literature reporting results in non-pregnant women, further work is required before justifying its use in pregnant women.Clinical Trial RegistrationACTRN 12616000531415p.Copyright © 2018 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.