• Michael Ragé, Nathalie Van Acker, Paul Facer, Ravikiran Shenoy, Michiel W M Knaapen, Maarten Timmers, Johannes Streffer, Praveen Anand, Theo Meert, and Leon Plaghki.
• Unité READ, Faculty of Medicine, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
• Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Aug 1; 121 (8): 1256-66.

ObjectiveTo assess the temporal relationship between skin nerve denervation and regeneration (dermal and intra-epidermal fibres, IENF) and functional changes (CO(2) laser-evoked potentials, LEPs, and quantitative sensory tests, QST) after topical cutaneous application of capsaicin.MethodsCapsaicin (0.075%) was applied to the lateral calf for three consecutive days. QST, LEPs and skin biopsies were performed at baseline and time intervals up to 54days post-capsaicin treatment. Biopsies were immunostained with antibodies for PGP9.5, TRPV1, and GAP-43 (marker of regenerating nerve fibres), and analyzed for IENFs and dermal innervation (for GAP-43).ResultsAt 1day post-capsaicin, cutaneous thermal sensitivity was reduced, as were LEPs. PGP9.5, TRPV1, and GAP-43 immunoreactive-nerve fibres were almost completely absent. By Day 12, LEPs had fully recovered, but PGP9.5 and TRPV1 IENF continued to be significantly decreased 54days post-capsaicin. In contrast, dermal GAP-43 immunoreactivity closely matched recovery of LEPs.ConclusionsA good correlation was observed between LEPs and GAP-43 staining, in contrast to PGP9.5 and TRPV1. Laser stimulation is a non-invasive and sensitive method for assessing the initial IENF loss, and regenerating nerve fibres.SignificanceAssessing skin biopsies by PGP9.5 immunostaining alone may miss significant diagnostic and prognostic information regarding regenerating nerve fibres, if other approaches are neglected, e.g. LEPs or GAP-43 immunostaining.Copyright 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. All rights reserved.

31 keywords...

hide…