• Anesthesiology · Jun 2019

    Adverse Events and Factors Associated with Potentially Avoidable Use of General Anesthesia in Cesarean Deliveries.

    A higher rate of hospital neuraxial labor analgesia is associated with a lower rate of unnecessary general anesthetic cesarean section.

    pearl
    • Jean Guglielminotti, Ruth Landau, and Guohua Li.
    • From the Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York (J.G., R.L., G.L.) French Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), Mixed Research Unit (UMR) 1137, Infection Antimicrobials Modelling Evolution (IAME), Paris, France (J.G.) Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York (G.L.).
    • Anesthesiology. 2019 Jun 1; 130 (6): 912922912-922.

    BackgroundCompared with neuraxial anesthesia, general anesthesia for cesarean delivery is associated with increased risk of maternal adverse events. Reducing avoidable general anesthetics for cesarean delivery may improve safety of obstetric anesthesia care. This study examined adverse events, trends, and factors associated with potentially avoidable general anesthetics for cesarean delivery.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed cesarean delivery cases without a recorded indication for general anesthesia or contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia in New York State hospitals, 2003 to 2014. Adverse events included anesthesia complications (systemic, neuraxial-related, and drug-related), surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, and the composite of death or cardiac arrest. Anesthesia complications were defined as severe if associated with death, organ failure, or prolonged hospital stay.ResultsDuring the study period, 466,014 cesarean deliveries without a recorded indication for general anesthesia or contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia were analyzed; 26,431 were completed with general anesthesia (5.7%). The proportion of avoidable general anesthetics decreased from 5.6% in 2003 to 2004 to 4.8% in 2013 to 2014 (14% reduction; P < 0.001). Avoidable general anesthetics were associated with significantly increased risk of anesthesia complications (adjusted odds ratio, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 1.9), severe complications (adjusted odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.6 to 5.2), surgical site infection (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.1), and venous thromboembolism (adjusted odds ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.0), but not of death or cardiac arrest. Labor neuraxial analgesia rate was one of the most actionable hospital-level factors associated with avoidable general anesthetics. Relative to hospitals with a rate greater than or equal to 75%, the adjusted odds ratio of avoidable general anesthetics increased to 1.3 (95% CI, 1.2 to 1.4), 1.6 (95% CI, 1.5 to 1.7), and 3.2 (95% CI, 3.0 to 3.5) as the rate decreased to 50 to 74.9%, 25 to 49.9%, and less than 25%, respectively.ConclusionsCompared with neuraxial anesthesia, avoidable general anesthetics are associated with increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

    pearl
    1

    A higher rate of hospital neuraxial labor analgesia is associated with a lower rate of unnecessary general anesthetic cesarean section.

    Daniel Jolley  Daniel Jolley
    comment
    0

    We’re still doing too many unnecessary general anaesthetic cesarean sections. It is not enough to be confident that we can conduct a ‘safe’ GA CS (ie. misperceived as meaning a low mortality risk), when avoidable GA CS are still associated with a spectrum of morbidity.

    Definitely falls into the category of ‘just because we can, doesn’t mean we should’...

    Daniel Jolley  Daniel Jolley
     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.