• Neuroscience · Jun 2019

    Conditioned Pain Modulation Affects the Withdrawal Reflex Pattern to Nociceptive Stimulation in Humans.

    • Fabricio Ariel Jure, Federico Gabriel Arguissain, Biurrun Manresa José Alberto JA Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), SMI®, Dept. of Health Science and Technology, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7, Aalborg Ø (9220), Aalborg,, and Ole Kæseler Andersen.
    • Integrative Neuroscience, SMI®, Dept. of Health Science and Technology, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7, Aalborg Ø (9220), Aalborg, Denmark. Electronic address: faj@hst.aau.dk.
    • Neuroscience. 2019 Jun 1; 408: 259-271.

    AbstractHuman studies have repeatedly shown that conditioning pain modulation (CPM) exerts an overall descending inhibitory effect over spinal nociceptive activity. Previous studies have reported a reduction of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) under CPM. Still, how descending control influences the muscle activation patterns involved in this protective behavior remains unknown. This study aimed to characterize the effects of CPM on the withdrawal pattern assessed by a muscle synergy analysis of several muscles involved in the lower limb NWR. To trigger descending inhibition, CPM paradigm was applied using the cold-pressor test (CPT) as conditioning stimulus. Sixteen healthy volunteers participated. The NWR was evoked by electrical stimulation on the arch of the foot before, during and after the CPT. Electromyographic (EMG) activity of two proximal (rectus femoris and biceps femoris) and two distal (tibialis anterior and soleus) muscles was recorded. A muscle synergy analysis was performed on the decomposition of the EMG signals, based on a non-negative matrix factorization algorithm. Results showed that two synergies (Module I and II) were sufficient to describe the NWR pattern. Under CPM, Module I activation amplitude was significantly reduced in a narrow time-window interval (118-156 ms) mainly affecting distal muscles, whereas Module II activation amplitude was significantly reduced in a wider time-window interval (150-250 ms), predominantly affecting proximal muscles. These findings suggest that proximal muscles are largely under supraspinal control. The descending inhibitory drive exerted onto the spinal cord may adjust the withdrawal pattern by differential recruitment of the muscles involved in the protective behavior.Copyright © 2019 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.