• Maren R Hov, Jo Røislien, Thomas Lindner, Erik Zakariassen, Kristi C G Bache, Volker M Solyga, David Russell, and Christian G Lund.
• Department of Research and Development, The Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak.
• Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Jun 1; 26 (3): 194-198.

BackgroundCerebral revascularization in acute stroke requires robust diagnostic tools close to symptom onset. The quantitative National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is widely used in-hospital, whereas shorter and less specific stroke scales are used in the prehospital field. This study explored the accuracy and potential clinical benefit of using NIHSS prehospitally.Patients And MethodsThirteen anesthesiologists trained in prehospital critical care enrolled patients with suspected acute stroke in a mobile stroke unit. NIHSS was completed twice in the acute phase: first prehospitally and then by an on-call resident neurologist at the receiving hospital. The agreement between prehospital and in-hospital NIHSS scores was assessed by a Bland-Altman plot, and inter-rater agreement for predefined clinical categories was tested using Cohen's κ.ResultsThis Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project study included 40 patients for analyses. The mean numerical difference between prehospital and in-hospital NIHSS scores was 0.85, with corresponding limits of agreement from - 5.94 to 7.64. Inter-rater agreement (κ) for the corresponding clinical categories was 0.38. A prehospital diagnostic workup (NIHSS and computed tomographic examination) was completed in median (quartiles) 10 min (range: 7-14 min). Time between the prehospital and in-hospital NIHSS scores was median (quartiles) 40 min (32-48 min).ConclusionCritical care physicians in a mobile stroke unit may use the NIHSS as a clinical tool in the assessment of patients experiencing acute stroke. The disagreement in NIHSS scores was mainly for very low values and would not have changed the handling of the patients.

24 keywords...

hide…