• Anne Miles, Vania Rodrigues, and Nick Sevdalis.
• Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK. Electronic address: ae.miles@bbk.ac.uk.
• Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Nov 1; 93 (2): 342-9.

ObjectiveTo examine the impact of numeric risk information about false negative (FN) and false positive (FP) rates in faecal occult blood testing (FOBt) on attitudes towards screening.Methods95 people aged 45-59, living in England, read 6 hypothetical vignettes presented online about the use of FOB testing to detect bowel cancer, in which information about FN and FP rates was systematically varied.ResultsBoth verbal and numeric FN risk information reduced people's interest in screening compared with no FN information. Numeric FN risk information reduced people's perceptions of screening effectiveness and lowered perceived trust in the results of screening compared with both verbal FN information and no FN information. FP information did not affect attitudes towards FOB testing. There was limited evidence that FN information reduced interest and perceptions of screening effectiveness more in educated groups.ConclusionNumeric FN risk information decreased people's perceptions of screening effectiveness and trust in the results of screening but did not affect people's interest in screening anymore than verbal FN risk information.Practice ImplicationsNumeric FN information could be added to patient information without affecting interest in screening, although this needs to be replicated in a larger, more representative sample.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

20 keywords...

hide…