-
Comparative Study
Minimum Three-Year Follow-up of Specific Functional Disabilities After Multi-Level Lumbar Fusion: Comparison of Long-Level and Short-Level Fusion.
- Jin-Sung Park, Chong-Suh Lee, Se-Jun Park, Kyung-Joon Lee, and Tae-Hoon Yum.
- Department of Orthopedics, Spine Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
- Spine. 2019 Oct 15; 44 (20): 1418-1425.
Study DesignRetrospective case-control study.ObjectiveTo evaluate specific functional disabilities after short- and long-level lumbar fusion.Summary Of Background DataThe Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) cannot represent all types of functional disabilities observed after lumbar fusion and a region-specific Functional Disability Index (SFDI) is necessary.MethodsWe examined the differences in postoperative functional disability between 81 patients who underwent ≥3-level lumbar fusion (group I) and 70 age- and sex-matched patients who underwent one- or two-level lumbar fusion (group II). The ODI and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were assessed pre- and postoperatively. The SFDI was assessed after lumbar fusion. We evaluated intergroup differences in postoperative VAS, ODI, and SFDI scores during 3-year follow-up. Each mean score was evaluated separately for the 10 ODI and the 12 SFDI items, and we evaluated the changes observed in these scores over the 3-year follow-up.ResultsThe mean intergroup preoperative ODI and VAS scores were similar. The mean postoperative intergroup VAS scores were similar; however, the mean postoperative ODI and SFDI scores were significantly higher in group I than in group II at 1-year (P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively) and 3-year follow-up (P = 0.037, P<0.001, respectively). Among 10 ODI items, group I showed significant disability with regard to six items at the 1-year follow-up compared with group II, but only showed significant disability with regard to one item at the 3-year follow-up. Among the 12 SFDI items, group I showed significant disability with regard to all 12 items at 1-year follow-up compared with group II, as well as significant disability with regard to nine items at 3-year follow-up.ConclusionThe SFDI is more sensitive than the ODI in assessing functional disabilities based on the levels of fusion. Most SFDI items indicated continued significant disability in patients with long-level lumbar fusion even 3 years postoperatively.Level Of Evidence3.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.