• Spine · Oct 2019

    Comparative Study

    Minimum Three-Year Follow-up of Specific Functional Disabilities After Multi-Level Lumbar Fusion: Comparison of Long-Level and Short-Level Fusion.

    • Jin-Sung Park, Chong-Suh Lee, Se-Jun Park, Kyung-Joon Lee, and Tae-Hoon Yum.
    • Department of Orthopedics, Spine Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
    • Spine. 2019 Oct 15; 44 (20): 1418-1425.

    Study DesignRetrospective case-control study.ObjectiveTo evaluate specific functional disabilities after short- and long-level lumbar fusion.Summary Of Background DataThe Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) cannot represent all types of functional disabilities observed after lumbar fusion and a region-specific Functional Disability Index (SFDI) is necessary.MethodsWe examined the differences in postoperative functional disability between 81 patients who underwent ≥3-level lumbar fusion (group I) and 70 age- and sex-matched patients who underwent one- or two-level lumbar fusion (group II). The ODI and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were assessed pre- and postoperatively. The SFDI was assessed after lumbar fusion. We evaluated intergroup differences in postoperative VAS, ODI, and SFDI scores during 3-year follow-up. Each mean score was evaluated separately for the 10 ODI and the 12 SFDI items, and we evaluated the changes observed in these scores over the 3-year follow-up.ResultsThe mean intergroup preoperative ODI and VAS scores were similar. The mean postoperative intergroup VAS scores were similar; however, the mean postoperative ODI and SFDI scores were significantly higher in group I than in group II at 1-year (P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively) and 3-year follow-up (P = 0.037, P<0.001, respectively). Among 10 ODI items, group I showed significant disability with regard to six items at the 1-year follow-up compared with group II, but only showed significant disability with regard to one item at the 3-year follow-up. Among the 12 SFDI items, group I showed significant disability with regard to all 12 items at 1-year follow-up compared with group II, as well as significant disability with regard to nine items at 3-year follow-up.ConclusionThe SFDI is more sensitive than the ODI in assessing functional disabilities based on the levels of fusion. Most SFDI items indicated continued significant disability in patients with long-level lumbar fusion even 3 years postoperatively.Level Of Evidence3.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…