• Shyle H Mehta, Christian M Hoelscher, Ashwini D Sharan, Sara Thalheimer, and Chengyuan Wu.
• Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
• Neuromodulation. 2021 Dec 1; 24 (8): 1336-1340.

BackgroundThe use of implantable pulse generators (IPG) for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with chronic pain has been well established. Although IPG-related complications have been reported on, the association between IPG site and SCS complications has not been well studied.ObjectiveTo investigate whether IPG placement site in buttock or flank is associated with SCS complications and, hence, revision surgeries.MethodA retrospective cohort study was performed that included 330 patients (52% female) treated at a single institution who underwent permanent implantation of an SCS system between 2014 and 2018. Patients ranged between 20 and 94 years of age (mean: 57.54 ± 13.25). Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics. Tests included independent samples t test, chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, and logistic regression.ResultsThere was a total of 93 revision surgeries (rate of 28%), where 71 out of 330 patients (rate of 21.5%) had had at least one revision surgery. Univariate tests demonstrated a significant association between IPG site and revision surgeries (p = 0.028 [chi-square test] and p = 0.031 [Mann-Whitney U test]); however, multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that neither IPG site was more likely than the other to require revision surgeries (p = 0.286).ConclusionAlthough this study found a significant association between IPG site and revision surgeries, the effect of IPG site was not found to be predictive. The IPG site likely influences whether a patient will require revision surgery, but further investigation is required to establish this association.© 2019 International Neuromodulation Society.

15 keywords...

hide…