• Jörg Ahrens, Gertrud Haeseler, Martin Leuwer, Bahram Mohammadi, Klaus Krampfl, Reinhard Dengler, and Johannes Bufler.
• Department of Anaesthesiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
• Anesth. Analg. 2004 Jul 1; 99 (1): 91-6.

AbstractThe anesthetic propofol (2,6 diisopropylphenol) mediates some of its effects by activating inhibitory chloride currents in the lower brainstem and spinal cord. The effects comprise direct activation of gamma-aminobutyric acid-A and glycine receptors in the absence of the natural agonist, as well as potentiation of the effect of submaximal agonist concentrations. Replacement of propofol's isopropyl groups by di-tert-butyl groups yields a compound without in vivo anesthetic effects. We have studied the effects of propofol and 2,6 di-tert-butylphenol on chloride inward currents via rat alpha1beta glycine receptors heterologously expressed in human embryonic kidney cells. Propofol, but not 2,6 di-tert-butylphenol, directly activated glycine receptors; half-maximal current activation was observed with propofol 114 +/- 27 microM. Both compounds potentiated the effect of a submaximal glycine concentration (10 microM) to a maximum value of 136% +/- 71% (propofol) and 279% +/- 109% (2,6 di-tert-butylphenol) of the response to glycine 10 microM. The 50% effective concentration for this effect was 12.5 +/- 6.4 microM and 9.4 +/- 10.2 microM for propofol and 2,6 di-tert-butylphenol, respectively. Propofol and its nonanesthetic structural analog do not differ in their ability to coactivate the glycine receptor but differ in their ability to directly activate the receptor in the absence of the natural agonist.

26 keywords...

hide…