Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Life-threatening anaphylaxis or febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions after transfusion of platelet concentrates (PCs) is a serious clinical problem caused by the sensitizing of recipients to plasma components, such as immunoglobulin A, or by cytokines. There is a possible indication for washing of PCs in these thrombocytopenic patients. However, only platelets that show activation after physiological stimulation are useful. ⋯ Because of increased spontaneous activation after washing we could demonstrate cytometrically a loss of induced activation of washed platelets. Furthermore, washing resulted in an impaired ADP-induced aggregability of platelets. These results have led us to reduce the frequency of washing of PCs in our institution, where the only current indication for washing of PCs is in patients with a history of severe nonhemolytic transfusion reactions.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA randomized comparison of a multimodal management strategy versus combination antiemetics for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
A multimodal management strategy for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) appears to be superior to single-drug prophylaxis. We tested the hypothesis that a multimodal PONV prophylaxis regimen incorporating total IV anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and a combination of ondansetron and droperidol is more effective than a combination of these antiemetics in the presence of an inhaled anesthetic. Ninety patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to one of three groups. ⋯ At 24 h, the complete response rate was 80%, 63%, and 43% in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.05, Group 1 versus Group 3). Patient satisfaction was also greater in the multimodal group than in the other two groups in the postanesthesia care unit (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the multimodal management strategy for PONV was associated with a higher complete response rate and greater patient satisfaction when compared with similar antiemetic prophylaxis with inhaled anesthesia or TIVA with propofol.