• Susan L Clemens, Helen L Berry, Brett M McDermott, and Catherine M Harper.
• Department of Health, Queensland Government, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Susan_Clemens@health.qld.gov.au.
• Med. J. Aust. 2013 Oct 21; 199 (8): 552-5.

ObjectivesTo assess the population prevalence of property, income and emotional impacts of the 2010-2011 Queensland floods and cyclones.Design, Setting And ParticipantsCross-sectional telephone-based survey using a brief trauma exposure and impact screening instrument, conducted between 11 March and 6 June 2011, of 6104 adults who answered natural disaster and mental health questions.Main Outcome MeasuresNatural disaster property damage exposure and emotional wellbeing impacts.ResultsTwo-thirds of respondents (62%) reported being affected by the disasters, with property damage exposure ranging from 37.2% (suburb or local area) to 9.2% (own home, with 2.1% living elsewhere at least temporarily). Income was reduced for 17.0% of respondents and 11.7% of income-producing property owners reported damage to those properties. Trauma impacts ranged from 14.3% of respondents feeling "terrified, helpless or hopeless" to 3.9% thinking they might be "badly injured or die". Up to 5 months after the disasters, 7.1% of respondents were "still distressed" and 8.6% were "worried about how they would manage". Adults of working age and residents of regional and remote areas and of socioeconomically disadvantaged areas were disproportionately likely to report exposure to damage and emotional impacts.ConclusionsWeather-related disasters exact a large toll on the population through property damage and resultant emotional effects. Vulnerable subpopulations are more severely affected. There is a need for realistic, cost-effective and rapid-deployment mass interventions in the event of weather disasters.

38 keywords...

hide…