-
Observational Study
Long-term changes in nutritional status are associated with functional and mortality outcomes among community-living older adults.
- Kai Wei, Nyunt Ma Shwe Zin MSZ Gerontology Research Programme, Department of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore., Qi Gao, Shiou Liang Wee, and Tze Pin Ng.
- Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore; Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
- Nutrition. 2019 Oct 1; 66: 180-186.
ObjectivesOlder adults who are malnourished are at high risk for adverse functional and mortality outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term changes in nutritional status among community-living older adults and their associations with adverse health outcomes.MethodsThis was a population-based observational cohort study (Singapore Longitudinal Aging Study, SLAS 1), with a 4- to 5-y follow-up of 2075 community-living adults ≥60 y of age. Nutritional status (Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form [MNA-SF] and Nutritional Screening Initiative [NSI]), instrumental/basic activities of daily living (IADLs/ADLs) and quality of life (QoL) were assessed at both baseline and at the 4- to 5-y follow-up. The 10-y mortality was assessed from the date of 4- to 5-y follow-up to March 2017. Estimates of associations between changes in nutritional status and adverse health outcomes were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression or Cox proportional hazards regression, and indicated by odds ratios/hazard ratios (ORs/HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsNutritional status was dynamic from baseline to the 4- to 5-y follow-up according to both MNA-SF and NSI. Compared with persistent normal nutrition, nutritional deterioration was associated with increased incident IADL/ADL disability (MNA-SF: OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.13-9.16), poor QoL (MNA-SF: OR, 4.53; 95% CI 2.13-9.64), and mortality (MNA-SF: HR, 4.76; 95% CI, 2.82-8.03; NSI: HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.27-3.14); nutritional improvement was associated with decreased incident IADL/ADL disability (NSI: OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.05-0.59); persistent poor nutrition (MNA-SF at risk/malnourished or NSI moderate/high nutritional risk) was associated with elevated incidence of poor QoL (MNA-SF: OR, 1.92,; 95% CI, 1.05-3.52; NSI: OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.19-4.49) and mortality (MNA-SF: HR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.59-4.15; NSI: HR 1.97; 95% CI, 1.17-3.32). Compared with persistent poor nutrition, nutritional improvement was also associated with decreased incidence of mortality (MNA-SF: HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.80).ConclusionsChanges in nutritional status are associated with adverse health outcomes, and should be monitored with simple screening tools to identify older adults at high risk for adverse functional and mortality outcomes for selective nutritional interventions.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.