• Lung Cancer · Sep 2003

    Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Histopathological evaluation of fluorescence bronchoscopy using resected lungs in cases of lung cancer.

    • Norihiko Ikeda, Toshimitsu Hiyoshi, Masatoshi Kakihana, Hidetoshi Honda, Yasufumi Kato, Tetsuya Okunaka, Kinya Furukawa, Takaaki Tsuchida, Harubumi Kato, and Yoshiro Ebihara.
    • First Department of Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1, Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan. ikeda@wd5.so-net.ne.jp
    • Lung Cancer. 2003 Sep 1; 41 (3): 303-9.

    AbstractObjective evaluation of the performance of autofluorescence bronchoscopy based on analysis of thin sections of the bronchus of resected lungs was performed and compared with the results of preoperative autofluorescence bronchoscopy. Conventional bronchoscopy and autofluorescence bronchoscopy were performed prior to surgery for lung cancer. Thin sections of the bronchus were obtained from the resected specimens. The thin sections were pathologically analyzed and the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopy was calculated. The subjects were 30 consecutive operable lung cancer cases who received white light and autofluorescence bronchoscopy before operation. A total of 163 thin sections of the bronchi in the resected lungs were made. The sensitivity of white light bronchoscopy for cancer was 90 and 31% for dysplasia. The respective figures for autofluorescence bronchoscopy were 97 and 50% for cancer and dysplasia. The specificity of white light and autofluorescence was 88 and 84%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of autofluorescence bronchoscopy was objectively confirmed. Autofluorescence examination showed better sensitivity for cancerous/precancerous lesions and the evaluation of the extent of cancer invasion was accurate.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.