• Yuh William T C WT 1 Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Rm NW011, Seattle, WA 98195., Matthew David Alexander, Toshihiro Ueda, Masayuki Maeda, Toshiaki Taoka, Kei Yamada, and Norman J Beauchamp.
• 1 Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Rm NW011, Seattle, WA 98195.
• AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan 1; 208 (1): 32-41.

ObjectiveAdvanced stroke imaging has generated much excitement for the early diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and facilitation of intervention. However, its therapeutic impact has not matched its diagnostic utility; most notably, lacking significant contributions to recent major AIS clinical trials. It is time to reexamine the fundamental hypotheses from the enormous body of imaging research on which clinical practices are based and reassess the current standard clinical and imaging strategies, or golden rules, established over decades for AIS. In this article, we will investigate a possible new window of opportunity in managing AIS through a better understanding of the following: first, the potential limitations of the golden rules; second, the significance of imaging-based parenchymal hypoperfusion (i.e., lower-than-normal relative cerebral blood flow [rCBF] may not be indicative of ischemia); third, the other critical factors (e.g., rCBF, collateral circulation, variable therapeutic window, chronicity of occlusion) that reflect more individual ischemic injury for optimal treatment selection; and, fourth, the need for penumbra validation in successfully reperfused patients (not in untreated patients).ConclusionIndividual variations in the therapeutic window, ischemic injury (rCBF), and chronicity of vascular lesion development have not been comprehensively incorporated in the standard algorithms used to manage AIS. The current established imaging parameters have not been consistently validated with successfully reperfused patients and rCBF to quantitatively distinguish between oligemia and ischemia and between penumbra and infarct core within ischemic tissue. A novel paradigm incorporating rCBF values or indirectly incorporating relative rCBF values with higher statistically powered imaging studies to more reliably assess the severity of ischemic injury and differentiate reversibility from viability within the area of imaging-based parenchymal hypoperfusion may provide a more personalized approach to treatment, including no treatment of infarction core, to further enhance outcomes.

18 keywords...

hide…