• Tolga Turan Dundar, Ayse Aralasmak, Serkan Kitiş, Fatih Temel Yılmaz, and Anas Abdallah.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmi Alem University, İstanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: tdundar@bezmialem.edu.tr.
• World Neurosurg. 2019 Dec 1; 132: e746-e751.

BackgroundAssessing clipped intracranial aneurysms for residues or incomplete occlusions is critical. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has been the gold standard for this. Previously, we presented subtracted computed tomography angiography (sub-CTA) from computed tomography perfusion as a more effective noninvasive technique for clipped aneurysms. The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness of sub-CTA with DSA in residue evaluation.MethodsA retrospective study of 17 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage operated on at our institution between November 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018, was performed. Residue aneurysms were evaluated with both sub-CTA and DSA. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Correlation between techniques was determined by the McNemar test and κ value.ResultsSensitivity of sub-CTA in residue evaluation was low in aneurysms ≤3 mm (positive predictive value = 60%). DSA detected residue aneurysm in 29% (5/17) of patients, whereas sub-CTA detected residue aneurysm in 11% (2/17). Only 40% of aneurysms (2/5) were demonstrated by sub-CTA, all >3 mm; 60% (3/5) were missed, all ≤3 mm.ConclusionsThis is the first study comparing the effectiveness of sub-CTA from computed tomography perfusion with DSA in residue aneurysm evaluation. Our results were suggestive, but not conclusive. DSA is still the gold standard in residue evaluation. Sub-CTA from computed tomography perfusion can be a reliable method in evaluation of residual aneurysm >3 mm.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

26 keywords...

hide…