• Rachel J Park, Henry Tsao, Andrew Claus, Andrew G Cresswell, and Paul W Hodges.
• The University of Queensland, NHMRC Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
• J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Feb 1; 43 (2): 74-82.

Study DesignCross-sectional controlled laboratory study.ObjectivesTo investigate the function of discrete regions of psoas major (PM) and quadratus lumborum (QL) with changes in spinal curvature and hip position.BackgroundAnatomically discrete regions of PM and QL may have differential function on the lumbar spine, based on anatomical and biomechanical differences in their moment arms between fascicles within each muscle.MethodsFine-wire electrodes were inserted with ultrasound guidance into PM fascicles arising from the transverse process (PM-t) and vertebral body (PM-v) and anterior (QL-a) and posterior (QL-p) layers of QL. Recordings were made on 9 healthy participants, who performed 7 tasks with maximal voluntary efforts and adopted 3 sitting postures that involved different spinal curvatures and hip angles.ResultsActivity of PM-t was greater during trunk extension than flexion, whereas activity of PM-v was greater during hip flexion than trunk efforts. Activity of QL-p was greater during trunk extension and lateral flexion, whereas QL-a showed greater activity during lateral flexion. During sitting tasks, PM-t was more active when sitting with a short lordosis than a flat (less extended) lumbar spine posture, whereas PM-v was similarly active in both sitting postures.ConclusionActivity of PM-t was more affected by changes in position of the lumbar spine than the hip, whereas PM-v was more actively involved in the movement of the hip rather than that of the lumbar spine. Moreover, from its anatomy, PM-t has a combined potential to extend/lordose the lumbar spine and flex the hip, at least in a flexed-hip position.

20 keywords...

hide…