• Medicine · Dec 2018

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    The efficacy of cervical spine phantoms for improving resident proficiency in performing ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch block: A prospective, randomized, comparative study.

    • So Young Kwon, Jong-Woan Kim, Min Ji Cho, Abdullah Hussain Al-Sinan, Yun-Joung Han, and Kim Young Hoon YH Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Kor.
    • Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon.
    • Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec 1; 97 (51): e13765.

    BackgroundFew studies have been conducted on the utility of cervical spine phantoms for practicing cervical procedures. Here, we describe a simple method for creating a cervical spine phantom and investigate whether the use of a gelatin-based phantom is associated with improved proficiency in performing ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch block.MethodsA cervical spine phantom was prepared using a cervical spine model immersed in a mixture of gelatin and psyllium husk. In total, 27 participants, inexperienced in spinal ultrasonography, were enrolled and allocated to 1 of 2 groups (training group, n = 18; control group, n = 9). All participants were tested (test-1) following an introductory course of basic ultrasonography. Participants in the control group were tested again after 1 week (test-2). Those in the training group received a further individual 3-hour training session, and were tested again after 1 week (test-2).ResultsThe mean performance score in test-1 was 62.5 ± 10.1 points in the training group and 62.3 ± 4.1 points in the control group [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -5.5 to 5.8; P = .954]. In test-2, the mean score was 86.8 ± 6.5 points and 59.9 ± 4.4 points in the training and control groups, respectively (95% CI 21.9-31.8; P < .001). The mean time required to complete test-1 was 84.6 ± 26.6 seconds in training group and 90.7 ± 43.9 seconds in the control group (95% CI -34.0 to 21.7; P = .653); in test-2, the time required was 56.6 ± 27.9 and 91.2 ± 43.8 seconds (95% CI -63.0 to -6.2; P = .019), respectively. Interobserver reliability showed excellent agreement based on the intraclass correlation coefficient, and moderate to almost perfect agreement by kappa statistics.ConclusionTraining using a gelatin-based cervical spine phantom helps novices acquire the skills necessary to perform ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch blocks.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…