-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
The efficacy of cervical spine phantoms for improving resident proficiency in performing ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch block: A prospective, randomized, comparative study.
- So Young Kwon, Jong-Woan Kim, Min Ji Cho, Abdullah Hussain Al-Sinan, Yun-Joung Han, and Kim Young Hoon YH Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Kor.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon.
- Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec 1; 97 (51): e13765.
BackgroundFew studies have been conducted on the utility of cervical spine phantoms for practicing cervical procedures. Here, we describe a simple method for creating a cervical spine phantom and investigate whether the use of a gelatin-based phantom is associated with improved proficiency in performing ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch block.MethodsA cervical spine phantom was prepared using a cervical spine model immersed in a mixture of gelatin and psyllium husk. In total, 27 participants, inexperienced in spinal ultrasonography, were enrolled and allocated to 1 of 2 groups (training group, n = 18; control group, n = 9). All participants were tested (test-1) following an introductory course of basic ultrasonography. Participants in the control group were tested again after 1 week (test-2). Those in the training group received a further individual 3-hour training session, and were tested again after 1 week (test-2).ResultsThe mean performance score in test-1 was 62.5 ± 10.1 points in the training group and 62.3 ± 4.1 points in the control group [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -5.5 to 5.8; P = .954]. In test-2, the mean score was 86.8 ± 6.5 points and 59.9 ± 4.4 points in the training and control groups, respectively (95% CI 21.9-31.8; P < .001). The mean time required to complete test-1 was 84.6 ± 26.6 seconds in training group and 90.7 ± 43.9 seconds in the control group (95% CI -34.0 to 21.7; P = .653); in test-2, the time required was 56.6 ± 27.9 and 91.2 ± 43.8 seconds (95% CI -63.0 to -6.2; P = .019), respectively. Interobserver reliability showed excellent agreement based on the intraclass correlation coefficient, and moderate to almost perfect agreement by kappa statistics.ConclusionTraining using a gelatin-based cervical spine phantom helps novices acquire the skills necessary to perform ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch blocks.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.