• Indu Bala, Krishna Prasad, Ishwar Bhukal, Dhiraj Nakra, and Monica Pratap.
• Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
• J Clin Anesth. 2008 Feb 1; 20 (1): 30-4.

Study ObjectiveTo determine whether combining erythromycin with ranitidine is more efficacious than erythromycin or established ranitidine-metoclopramide combination in reducing the volume and acidity of gastric aspirate.DesignRandomized, double-blind study.SettingOperating room complex.PatientsEighty ASA physical status I and II patients.InterventionPatients were divided into 4 groups of 20 patients each. All patients received the study medication (in tablet form) packed in identical gelatin capsules 60 to 90 minutes before surgery in the premedication room. Patients in group PP were given two placebo tablets; group EP received erythromycin 250 mg, and placebo; group ER received erythromycin 250 mg, and ranitidine 150 mg; and group RM was given ranitidine 150 mg, and metoclopramide 10 mg.MeasurementsAfter tracheal intubation, gastric fluid was aspirated via orogastric tube, and volume and pH of the aspirate were studied.ResultsSignificantly higher gastric volume occurred in group PP than groups EP, ER, or RM (P < 0.001). There were no differences in volumes among groups EP, ER, and RM. Gastric pH was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in groups PP and EP than in groups ER and RM.ConclusionErythromycin and ranitidine combination is more efficacious than erythromycin alone in reducing the acidity and volume of gastric fluid. No difference was found between erythromycin-ranitidine and ranitidine-metoclopramide combination.

This article appears in the collection: Is preoperative ranitidine effective at reducing induction aspiration?.

35 keywords...

hide…