• C Leroy, A Ricard-Hibon, C Chollet, and J Marty.
• Service d'anesthésie-réanimation-Smur, hôpital Beaujon, 100, boulevard du Général-Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France.
• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2003 Mar 1; 22 (3): 183-8.

ObjectiveTo evaluate prehospital management of elderly patients, agreement between prehospital and hospital diagnosis and to observe clinical course during hospitalization.Type Of StudyRetrospective study.Patients And MethodOut-of hospital patients of 65-year-old or more were included. Apart from demographic data, were collected: reasons for call, medicalization length, SAPS score, prehospital management, destination, prehospital and hospital diagnosis and patients evolution. Three groups were defined: G1 (65-74), G2 (75-84), G3 (> 84 year old). Statistical analysis was done by an Anova for quantitative data and by a Chi squared test for qualitative data.ResultsTwo hundred and seventy-one patients were included (mean age 80 +/- 8 years, 43% of men). Eighty-two per cent of interventions were followed by a medicalized transport. Twelve per cent of patients died in the field. Forty-four per cent were hospitalised in intensive care unit, but patients of more than 84 year-old were significantly less often admitted in intensive care unit. There was no difference between the three groups in term of degree medicalization during transport. Eight per cent of patients required tracheal intubation in the field. Prehospital diagnoses were in agreement with reason for call in 61% of patients and with in-hospital diagnosis in 85% of patients. Fifty three per cent of patients came back home after hospitalisation.ConclusionAnalysis of elderly patient evolution after hospitalisation confirms the idea that the age should not influence the decision and the degree of prehospital medicalization.

18 keywords...

hide…