• A Desachy, A Vuagnat, S Massé, O Baudin, P Vacher, S Calvat, and J C Texier.
• Service de réanimation polyvalente, centre hospitalier d'Angoulême, 16470 Saint-Michel, France. arnaud.desachy@ch-angouleme.rss.fr
• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2003 Oct 1; 22 (8): 704-10.

ObjectivesAssessment of oral and written information programme for blood transfusion in critical care patients and study of factors associated with the biological follow-up.Study DesignProspective study in one intensive care unit.Patients And MethodsAll blood recipients in 2000 were orally informed of transfusion process. In regard to the French haemovigilance regulation, written paper was given to the patient or passed on to the next hospital physician. Four months later, a questionnaire was proposed to the patients.ResultsIn 2000, blood transfusion was performed for 102 patients and data were obtained for 59 patients (34 number of survivor patients, follow-up was impossible for eight and one refused the questionnaire). Quality assurance programme permit a global orally and written information of critical care patients. However, thirty-eight patients (64%) remembered oral information. Patients were younger (55 +/- 22 vs 68 +/- 13, OR = 1.04; p = 0.03). Biological follow-up was obtained for 22 patients (37%), particularly when written information was directly given to the patient (22/24 vs 2/35; OR = 335; p < 0.0001).ConclusionBiological follow-up was obtained for only one third of blood recipients, because, in first, only 64% of critical care patients remembered oral information, particularly the younger patients. Perhaps, written information systematically given to the patient could permit a high biological follow-up. This study confirmed the lack of sensitivity of all hospital physician for haemovigilance.

20 keywords...

hide…