• J Clin Anesth · Mar 2020

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    A randomized trial of the glottic views with the classic Miller, Wis-Hipple and C-MAC (videolaryngoscope and direct views) straight size 1 blades in young children.

    • Hussein Elattar, Islam Abdel-Rahman, Muhammad Ibrahim, Remek Kocz, Michelle Raczka, Anuj Kumar, Baiba Senbruna, Tara Gensler, and Jerrold Lerman.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, Oishei Children's Outpatient Center, 1001 Main St. Suite K-3502, Buffalo 14203, United States of America; Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
    • J Clin Anesth. 2020 Mar 1; 60: 57-61.

    Study ObjectiveThe Miller and Wis-Hipple size 1 blades are widely used for laryngoscopy in children and the C-MAC straight blade is used increasingly in young children, although the glottic views with these blades have not been compared. To determine whether the glottic views with these blades are equivalent.DesignEquivalent study.SettingOperating room.Patients96 children <2 years, ASA 1 or 2, elective surgery requiring orotracheal intubation.InterventionsDirect laryngoscopy with the Miller and Wis-Hipple or C-MAC (videolaryngoscope and direct view) straight blades size 1; photographs of the glottic opening.MeasurementsPercent of glottic opening (POGO) was measured using a standardized scale by a blinded investigator. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure and hemoglobin oxygen saturation were measured before and after laryngoscopy.ResultsThe POGO scores with the four blades/views were equivalent (fewer than 20% of the views yielded POGO scores <80). However, a post hoc comparison of the POGO scores yielded significant differences (P = 0.0001); the C-MAC videolaryngoscope view yielded significantly better scores than the Miller, Wis-Hipple and direct C-MAC views (P = 0.0009, 0.0002 and 0.0001 respectively). The POGO score with the Miller blade was superior to that with the direct C-MAC view (P = 0.024). No adverse events or complications occurred.ConclusionThe four blades/glottic views were equivalent, although a post hoc analysis demonstrated that the glottic view with the C-MAC videolaryngoscope was superior overall and the view with the Miller size 1 was superior to that with the direct C-MAC view.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.