-
J Trauma Acute Care Surg · Dec 2016
Multicenter Study Observational StudyCervical spinal clearance: A prospective Western Trauma Association Multi-institutional Trial.
- Kenji Inaba, Saskya Byerly, Lisa D Bush, Matthew J Martin, David T Martin, Kimberly A Peck, Galinos Barmparas, Matthew J Bradley, Joshua P Hazelton, Raul Coimbra, Asad J Choudhry, Carlos V R Brown, Chad G Ball, Jill R Cherry-Bukowiec, Clay Cothren Burlew, Bellal Joseph, Julie Dunn, Christian T Minshall, Matthew M Carrick, Gina M Berg, Demetrios Demetriades, and WTA C-Spine Study Group.
- From the LAC+USC Medical Center (K.I., S.B., D.D.), Los Angeles, California; Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Service (L.D.M., M.J.M.), Legacy Emanuel Medical Center, Portland, Oregon; Oregon Health and Science University (D.M.), Portland, Oregon; Scripps Mercy Hospital (K.A.P.), San Diego, California; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (G.B.), Los Angeles, California; R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center (M.J.B.), University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Cooper University Hospital (J.P.H.), Camden, New Jersey; University of California (R.C.), San Diego, San Diego, California; Mayo Clinic (A.J.C.), Rochester, Minnesota; University Medical Center at Brackenridge (C.V.R.B.), Austin, Texas; University of Calgary-Foothills Medical Center (C.G.B.), Calgary, Alberta, Canada; University of Michigan (J.R.C-B.), Ann Arbor, Michigan; Denver Health Medical Center (C.C.B.), Denver, Colorado; Banner University Medical Center (B.J.), Tucson, AZ; University of Colorado Health-Medical Center of the Rockies (J.D.), Loveland, Colorado; Parkland Memorial Hospital (C.T.M.), University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas; Medical Center of Plano (M.M.C.), Plano, Texas; and Wesley Medical Center (G.M.B.), Wichita, Kansas.
- J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Dec 1; 81 (6): 1122-1130.
BackgroundFor blunt trauma patients who have failed the NEXUS (National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study) low-risk criteria, the adequacy of computed tomography (CT) as the definitive imaging modality for clearance remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the accuracy of CT for the detection of clinically significant cervical spine (C-spine) injury.MethodsThis was a prospective multicenter observational study (September 2013 to March 2015) at 18 North American trauma centers. All adult (≥18 years old) blunt trauma patients underwent a structured clinical examination. NEXUS failures underwent a CT of the C-spine with clinical follow-up to discharge. The primary outcome measure was sensitivity and specificity of CT for clinically significant injuries requiring surgical stabilization, halo, or cervical-thoracic orthotic placement using the criterion standard of final diagnosis at the time of discharge, incorporating all imaging and operative findings.ResultsTen thousand seven hundred sixty-five patients met inclusion criteria, 489 (4.5%) were excluded (previous spinal instrumentation or outside hospital transfer); 10,276 patients (4,660 [45.3%] unevaluable/distracting injuries, 5,040 [49.0%] midline C-spine tenderness, 576 [5.6%] neurologic symptoms) were prospectively enrolled: mean age, 48.1 years (range, 18-110 years); systolic blood pressure 138 (SD, 26) mm Hg; median, Glasgow Coma Scale score, 15 (IQR, 14-15); Injury Severity Score, 9 (IQR, 4-16). Overall, 198 (1.9%) had a clinically significant C-spine injury requiring surgery (153 [1.5%]) or halo (25 [0.2%]) or cervical-thoracic orthotic placement (20 [0.2%]). The sensitivity and specificity for clinically significant injury were 98.5% and 91.0% with a negative predictive value of 99.97%. There were three (0.03%) false-negative CT scans that missed a clinically significant injury, all had a focal neurologic abnormality on their index clinical examination consistent with central cord syndrome, and two of three scans showed severe degenerative disease.ConclusionsFor patients requiring acute imaging for their C-spine after blunt trauma, CT was effective for ruling out clinically significant injury with a sensitivity of 98.5%. For patients with an abnormal neurologic examination as the trigger for imaging, there is a small but clinically significant incidence of a missed injury, and further imaging with magnetic resonance imaging is warranted.Level Of EvidenceDiagnostic tests, level II.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.