• V de Laitre, J-Y Lefrant, S Jaber, J Baudot, L Papazian, L Muller, G Mercier, P Fabbro-Péray, J Ripart, J-J Eledjam, and J-E de La Coussaye.
• Fédération d'Anesthésie-Douleur-Urgences-Réanimation, Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Caremeau, CHU de Nîmes, place du professeur Robert-Debré, 30029 Nîmes cedex 09, France.
• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2006 May 1; 25 (5): 493-500.

ObjectivesAssessment of relationship between general practitioners and intensivists.Study DesignIntensivists were questioned by phone from June 14th to September 28th 2004.Methods245 out of 264 intensivists from 8 French Southern regional areas were questioned concerning their relationship with critically ill patients' general practitioner.ResultsPatients were mainly admitted into Intensive care Unit (ICU) from the Emergency Department (55%). An information letter from the general practitioner was reported for 20% of admitted patients but 50% of these letters was assumed as not informative. The informations concerning the patient's medical history, therapies, and disease leading to admission and the patient's status were assessed with 6.5, 7.0, 6.0 and 2.0, respectively (maximal note=10). The intensivists contacted the general practitioner for 30% of admitted patients. During the stay in ICU, 33% general practitioners were reported to request informations by phone or visit in ICU. When the stay in ICU was>10 days, the general practitioner was nearly never regularly informed about patient's status. When the patient was discharged from the ICU, 80% of intensivists used an exhaustive typed report to inform the general practitioner. The overall relationship between the general practitioner and the intensivist was assessed as 5.5/10. Insufficient information in the general practitioner's letter at admission, the lack of request for information during the stay in ICU, the lack of contact with the general practitioner by the intensivist and an intensivist's age between 46 and 55 were associated with a relationship assessment<4/10).

19 keywords...

hide…