• Der Anaesthesist · Sep 1996

    Comparative Study

    [Comparative study of the efficiency of bacterial filters in long-term mechanical ventilation].

    • H J Nielsen, P Mecke, S Tichy, and P Schmucker.
    • Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Medizinische Universität zu Lübeck.
    • Anaesthesist. 1996 Sep 1; 45 (9): 814-8.

    UnlabelledTwo commercially available bacterial filters to be used as part of the mechanical ventilation unit during anaesthesia were tested for hygienic criteria. Manufacturers claim that bacterial breathing filters have a filtration capacity of about 99.995%, so that there would be no need for thermal disinfection of tubing and ventilation circuits after each use. One filter is designed for a single use only, the other can be used up to 24 times after sterilisation. Both filters consist of hydrophobic glass fibres.MethodsDuring simulated mechanical ventilation for 24 h, an alcoholic suspension of Bacillus subtilis was atomized in front of the filters tested. A gelatin membrane filter was integrated in the ventilation circuit and captured the filtered gas behind the test filter.ResultsDuring simulated mechanical ventilation for 24 h, the filtration capacity of both the disposable and reusable filters (Table 2) did not confirm the manufacturers' short-term technical findings over 8 s (DIN-EN 143).ConclusionsThe use of bacterial filters during mechanical ventilation reduces the probability of bacterial contamination, but does not make sterilisation of the tubes and ventilation circuit unnecessary.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…