• Nicolas Claidière, Thomas C Scott-Phillips, and Dan Sperber.
• CNRS, Fédération de recherche 3C, Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive, Université d'Aix - Marseille, , 3 Place Victor Hugo, Bât. 9, Case D, 13331 Marseille cedex, France.
• Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 2014 May 19; 369 (1642): 20130368.

AbstractDarwin-inspired population thinking suggests approaching culture as a population of items of different types, whose relative frequencies may change over time. Three nested subtypes of populational models can be distinguished: evolutionary, selectional and replicative. Substantial progress has been made in the study of cultural evolution by modelling it within the selectional frame. This progress has involved idealizing away from phenomena that may be critical to an adequate understanding of culture and cultural evolution, particularly the constructive aspect of the mechanisms of cultural transmission. Taking these aspects into account, we describe cultural evolution in terms of cultural attraction, which is populational and evolutionary, but only selectional under certain circumstances. As such, in order to model cultural evolution, we must not simply adjust existing replicative or selectional models but we should rather generalize them, so that, just as replicator-based selection is one form that Darwinian selection can take, selection itself is one of several different forms that attraction can take. We present an elementary formalization of the idea of cultural attraction.

6 keywords...

hide…