• Punnavit Harimtepathip, James R Lee, Elliot Griffith, Gabriel Williams, Ravi V Patel, David Lebowitz, and Sina Koochakzadeh.
• Internal Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, USA.
• Cureus. 2018 Oct 29; 10 (10): e3511.

AbstractThe International Consensus Definition for Sepsis and Septic Shock Task Force has recently developed new methods to determine whether a patient is at risk for end organ failure after he has been suspected to have sepsis. One of the newest measures developed is a quick Sequential (Sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and it is used to identify patients who are at risk of sepsis outside the intensive care unit. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score has previously been the standard for determining a patient's sepsis risk and prognosis for future mortality. With the development of these new tools, it is imperative to compare qSOFA to SIRS in order to determine which method is best and under which circumstances. We conclude that according to evidence currently available, qSOFA has limited use for patients in the intensive care unit at the time of evaluation for predicting mortality and organ dysfunction. Furthermore, qSOFA outranks SIRS for patients in the emergency department except for SIRS delivering positive results more quickly.

6 keywords...

hide…