• John P Rosborough and D Curtis Deno.
• Research Education Institute, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA. jprosborough@aol.com
• Resuscitation. 2004 Oct 1; 63 (1): 65-72.

BackgroundDefibrillation may convert ventricular fibrillation (VF) only to reveal profound mechanical dysfunction. Survival following this dysfunction, known as pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and electromechanical dissociation (EMD), is uncommon. We sought to evaluate an electrical therapy for primary post shock PEA following short duration VF.Methods And ResultsForty-eight episodes of VF, lasting 110 +/- 25 s, were induced in 16 anesthetized dogs. Following defibrillation, 35 episodes met PEA criteria (ABP < or = 36 mmHg diastolic and pulse pressure < or = 14 mmHg in the first 20 s post shock). These post defibrillation PEA episodes were either Not Treated (NT) or Treated (T) with packets of 4-20 monophasic 0.2 ms 50-100 Hz pulses of 20-60 V applied across the tip and coil of an integrated bipolar transvenous defibrillation lead positioned in the right ventricle. The therapeutic endpoint was return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC; self-sustained ABP > or = 60 mmHg diastolic and/or > or = 100 mmHg systolic) for over 2 min. In the Not Treated group, only 4 of 19 (21%) episodes spontaneously recovered to ROSC in 123 +/- 49 s while in the Treated group, 11 of 16 (69%) of the PEA episodes achieved ROSC in 102 +/- 92 s.ConclusionsElectrical therapy increased the likelihood of ROSC in primary post defibrillation PEA three-fold (P < 0.01). Recovery occurred in the absence of thoracic compression, mechanical ventilation, or adjunctive drug therapy.

9 keywords...

hide…