• Zachary C Lum, David A Crawford, Adolph V Lombardi, Jason M Hurst, Michael J Morris, Joanne B Adams, and Keith R Berend.
• Doctors Medical Center, Orthopaedic Surgery Department, 1441 Florida Avenue, Modesto, CA 95350, USA.
• Knee. 2018 Jan 1; 25 (1): 161-166.

BackgroundMedial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) may have advantages over total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the setting of obesity. There has been no direct comparison between the two cohorts. This study compares outcomes and complications of severely obese patients undergoing medial UKA versus TKA.MethodsSix hundred and fifty medial UKA and 1300 TKA were performed in patients with BMI >35kg/m2 (mean 41kg/m2) between 2007 and 2012. Pre- and postoperative ROM, Knee Society scores, perioperative factors, complications and reoperations were compared.ResultsUKA patients had higher preoperative ROM, and Knee Society pain (KSP), functional (KSF), and clinical (KSC) scores (p<0.001, p=0.0008, p=0.0003, p=0.051 respectively). Mean tourniquet times, operative times, and lengths of stay were lower after UKA. Four TKA patients required transfusion. Mean follow-up was 2.3years. The frequency of manipulation under anesthesia was higher in TKA patients (p<0.001), while the rate of component revision was similar between the two groups (1.2% vs. 1.7%, p=0.328). Frequency of deep infection was lower in the UKA group (p=0.016). Postoperative KSF, change in KSF, and ROM were higher (p<0.0001) after UKA, but KSP and KSC were equivalent.ConclusionsSeverely obese patients who underwent medial UKA demonstrated equal survivorship with substantially fewer reoperations, reduced deep infection, and less perioperative complications at short term follow-up. Severely obese patients had improved KSF scores and maintenance of ROM after UKA compared with TKA.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

31 keywords...

hide…