• Orthopaedic surgery · Aug 2009

    Comparative Study

    Clinical experience and results of lumbar microendoscopic discectomy: a study with a five-year follow-up.

    • Yue Zhou, Min Wang, Jian Wang, Tong-wei Chu, Zheng-feng Zhang, and Chang-qing Li.
    • Department of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. happyzhou@vip.163.com
    • Orthop Surg. 2009 Aug 1; 1 (3): 171-5.

    ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation over a five-year follow-up period.MethodsBetween January 2000 and December 2002, 275 patients were accepted for MED in our hospital. A retrospective review was carried out on 151 of these cases with a mean of five years follow-up. The study helped us to assess the efficacy of this technique in the treatment of lumbar disc diseases. Modified MacNab criteria were used to assess the clinical outcome, and the disc-height ratio was assessed radiographically according to the Mochida's method.ResultsAccording to the modified MacNab criteria, 78.8% of patients were rated as excellent, 13.2% as good, 4.6% as fair, and 3.3% as poor. Complications included five revision surgeries due to recurrence of herniation, five dural lacerations during operation, and three cases of vertebral/disc infection. The average disc-height ratio was 76.25%. Approximately 57% of the patients maintained their primary engagement.ConclusionMED is both feasible and efficacious for the management of lumbar disc disease. On the basis of the present study it is concluded that MED is better than open discectomy (OD).© 2009 Tianjin Hospital and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…