• Neuroscience · May 2020

    Timing of Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability by Heartbeat Differs with Interoceptive Accuracy.

    • Naofumi Otsuru, Shota Miyaguchi, Sho Kojima, Koya Yamashiro, Daisuke Sato, Hirotake Yokota, Kei Saito, Yasuto Inukai, and Hideaki Onishi.
    • Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan; Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan. Electronic address: otsuru@nuhw.ac.jp.
    • Neuroscience. 2020 May 1; 433: 156-162.

    AbstractInteroceptive inputs are ascending information from the internal body. Cortical activities have been shown to be elicited by interoceptive inputs from the heartbeat at approximately 200-600 ms after the R wave, and sensory processing is modulated by the heartbeat within the time window. However, the influence of interoceptive inputs and their timing on corticospinal excitability has not yet been fully elucidated. Moreover, in previous studies, individual differences in interoceptive accuracy-objective accuracy in detecting internal bodily sensations assessed by heartbeat perception tasks-can be considered as an important factor influencing cortical activities by the heartbeat. We therefore investigated the modulation of corticospinal excitability by the heartbeat and its timing by recording motor-evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex at various timings from the R wave. We also investigated the relationship between this modulation and individual interoceptive accuracy. We found a significant positive correlation between the modulation of corticospinal excitability at 200 ms after the R wave and interoceptive accuracy. Conversely, we found a significant negative correlation between the modulation of corticospinal excitability at 400 ms after the R wave and interoceptive accuracy. These results indicated that the corticospinal excitability was modulated at 200-400 ms after the R wave (systolic phase) and that the timing of excitatory or inhibitory states in the corticospinal pathway differed with interoceptive accuracy. Although the neural mechanism remains unclear, these findings may aid in determining new factors influencing corticospinal excitability.Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…