• Medicine · Feb 2019

    Meta Analysis

    Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails.

    • Feng Fei Lin, Yi Fan Chen, Bin Chen, Chao Hui Lin, and Ke Zheng.
    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Fuzhou Second Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University.
    • Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb 1; 98 (8): e14634.

    BackgroundThe purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness and safety of cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.MethodsWe searched PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from their inception to February 2016. All RCTs comparing cemented with uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures were eligible. The participants who underwent primary hemiarthroplasty for unilateral femoral neck fracture were older than 55 and the mean age of more than 75 years old. For the trials before 2006 used old designed prostheses, so we excluded trails before 2006 which used old designed prostheses. Outcomes of interest include postoperative hip function, Harris hip score (HHS), mortality, reoperation rate, complications, operation time, intraoperative blood loss. Two reviewers independently evaluated the included studies and extracted data into RevMan. Quality Assessments were classified by agreement of 2 authors based on the Cochrane tool.ResultsSeven trials were eligible. Postoperative hip function at 12 months cemented hemiarthroplasty was better than that in uncemented hemiarthroplasty (OR = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.31-0.88; P = .01). Postoperative fractures rates in cemented hemiarthroplasty were lower than that in uncemented hemiarthroplasty (OR = 0.09, 95% CI, 0.02-0.38; P = .001). Also, the interoperative fracture rates in cemented hemiarthroplasty were lower than that in uncemented hemiarthroplasty (OR = 0.29, 95% CI, 0.13-0.68; P = .004). Shorter operation time was achieved in uncemented hemiarthroplasty than that in cemented hemiarthroplasty (WMD = 8.22 min, 95% CI, 5.57-10.86 min; P<.00001). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with HHS, mortality, wound infection, dislocation, general complications, reoperation rate, and intraoperative blood loss.ConclusionThe available evidence indicates that compared with uncemented hemiarthroplasty cemented hemiarthroplasty achieved better postoperative hip function, less postoperative, and interoperative fractures in displaced femoral neck fracture. Uncemented hemiarthroplasty achieved shorter operation time. There was no difference between the 2 groups with HHS at 1 year, mortality, and complications.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.