-
Int J Gynaecol Obstet · Jun 2016
Multicenter Study Comparative StudyMulticenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
- Peter C Lim, John T Crane, Eric J English, Richard W Farnam, Devin M Garza, Marc L Winter, and Jerry L Rozeboom.
- The Center of Hope, Renown Regional Medical Center, Reno, NV, USA. Electronic address: pclimgyo@gmail.com.
- Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Jun 1; 133 (3): 359-64.
ObjectiveTo compare perioperative outcomes between robotic-assisted benign hysterectomies and abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomies when performed by high-volume surgeons.MethodsA multicenter data analysis compared 30-day outcomes from consecutive robotic-assisted hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons (≥60 prior procedures) at nine centers with records retrieved from the Premier Perspective database for abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomies performed by high-volume gynecologic surgeons. Data on benign hysterectomy disorders from January 1, 2012 to September 30, 2013 were included.ResultsData from 2300 robotic-assisted, 9745 abdominal, 8121 vaginal, and 11 952 laparoscopic hysterectomies were included. The robotic-assisted patient cohort had a significantly higher rate of adhesive disease compared with the vaginal (P<0.001) and laparoscopic cohorts (P<0.001), a significantly higher rate of morbid obesity than the vaginal (P<0.001) or laparoscopic cohorts (P<0.001), and a significantly higher rate of large uteri (>250g) than the abdominal (P<0.001), vaginal (P<0.001), or laparoscopic cohorts (P=0.017). The robotic-assisted cohort experienced significantly fewer intraoperative complications than the abdominal (P<0.001) and vaginal cohorts (P<0.001), and experienced significantly fewer postoperative complications compared with all the comparator cohorts (P<0.001).ConclusionWhen performed by gynecologic surgeons with relevant high-volume experience, robotic-assisted benign hysterectomy provided improved outcomes compared with abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomy.Copyright © 2016 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.