• Weili Feng, Shiyuan Lin, Daoqiang Huang, Jian Huang, Luyao Chen, Weiwei Wu, Shiqiang Hu, Zhantu Wei, and Xiaoping Wang.
• First Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Xiaolan Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 65, Jucheng Rd. Xiaolan Dist. 528415. Zhongshan, Guangdong Prov. P.R. China.
• Injury. 2020 Jun 1; 51 (6): 1250-1257.

BackgroundSurgical hand rubbing (SHR) and surgical hand scrubbing (SHS) are two common methods used by surgeons to reduce surgical site infections. To date, the optimal method that can effectively reduce these infections remains unknown. In this study, we performed a comprehensive statistical analysis to compare the efficacy of these two methods in effectively controlling surgical site infections.MethodsA systemic review and meta-analysis was performed by mining literature from major databases, including Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library, Ovid and Google Scholar, and recruiting studies published between 1980 and 1st April 2019. Analysis was performed using Revman, version 5.3, software, and focused on primary outcomes that included colony-forming unit (CFU) counts and logarithmic reduction of CFU after hand antisepsis and after surgery.ResultsSeven clinical trials met our inclusion criteria, with a total of 764 healthcare workers analyzed. We found no statistically significant differences between the two methods with regards to CFU counts and logarithmic reduction of CFU after hand antisepsis and surgery, as well as antisepsis and surgery times.ConclusionFrom the literature, it was evident that SHR had similar efficacy to SHS, without necessarily increasing costs. Owing to advantages such as ease of application, exposure to less dermal irritation, and less time consumption, SHR is recommended as a cost-effective alternative for management of surgical site infections.Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

19 keywords...

hide…