-
Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. · Mar 2020
Trends in antithrombotic management of patients with atrial fibrillation. A report from the Polish part of the EURObservational Research Programme - Atrial Fibrillation General Long-Term Registry.
- Piotr Lodziński, Monika Gawałko, Monika Budnik, Agata Tymińska, Krzysztof Ozierański, Marcin Grabowski, Agnieszka Janion-Sadowska, Grzegorz Opolski, Radosław Lenarczyk, Zbigniew Kalarus, Lip Gregory Y H GYH Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Aalborg Thrombos, and Paweł Balsam.
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
- Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. 2020 Mar 27; 130 (3): 196-205.
IntroductionData on antithrombotic treatment among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in Poland are limited.ObjectivesWe aimed to describe antithrombotic management within the Polish part of the EUROobservational Research Programme on Atrial Fibrillation General Long-Term Registry.Patients And MethodsWe analyzed data collected at baseline and at 1‑year follow‑up from 701 Polish patients treated at 25 Polish centers between 2013 and 2016.ResultsAny antithrombotic therapy was administered to 94% of patients (vitamin K antagonists [VKAs], 53%; non‑VKA oral anticoagulants [NOACs], 36%; antiplatelet therapy [APT], 4.8%). However, 78% of patients considered as "low‑risk" (CHA2DS2‑VASc = 0 in men or 1 in women) were prescribed oral anticoagulants and 12% were on APT. Independent predictors of NOAC and VKA use were first‑detected AF and device therapy. Predictors of VKA use were lone AF, history of ischemic stroke, and pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis; of NOAC use, permanent AF; of APT use, history of hemorrhagic events and first‑detected or persistent AF; and of no antithrombotic treatment, young age. Incorrect NOAC prescription was more common in the reduced‑dose group than in the full‑dose group (30% vs 7%). During follow‑up, the all‑cause mortality rate was 5.2%, 0.8%, 15%, and 7% (P <0.0001) and the risk of thromboembolic events was 0.4%, 0.5%, 6.2%, and 0% (P = 0.04) in patients on VKA, NOAC, APT, and no treatment, respectively.ConclusionsPatients with the lowest stroke risk are often overtreated. The choice of proper antithrombotic strategy does not depend solely on factors incorporated in the CHA2DS2‑VASc score. Higher mortality is observed among APT‑treated patients and those without antithrombotic treatment.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.