International journal of surgery
-
Comparative Study
Conventional wound management versus a closed suction irrigation method for infected laparotomy wound--a comparative study.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a closed suction irrigation method for the management of infected laparotomy wounds. ⋯ Encouraging results were obtained with the use of the closed suction irrigation method for infected laparotomy wounds. The closed suction irrigation method decreased hospital stay and allowed early rehabilitation. The findings of our study need to be substantiated in large-scale randomized controlled trials.
-
Abnormal muscle response (AMR) to the electrical stimulation of a branch of facial nerve is a specific electrophysiological feature of primary hemifacial spasm (HFS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of AMR monitoring during microvascular decompression surgery (MVD), and the correlation between the AMR changes and the clinical outcomes. ⋯ Intraoperative AMR monitoring was an effective assistant for a successful MVD for the patient with HFS. It is worth being routinely employed during the operation.
-
The root exit zone (REZ) of the seventh cranial nerve has been the target of microvascular decompression surgery (MVD) while searching the neurovascular conflict for treatment of hemifacial spasm for long time. Recently, increasing cases regarding the offending vessel beyond the REZ have been reported. To verify whether a thorough dissection of the nerve may give rise to a better postoperative result without enhancing complications, we conducted a parallel investigation. ⋯ These findings suggested that the entire-root-decompression technique is recommended while performing MVDs in patients with hemifacial spasm.
-
Peri-operative monitoring technology has made great strides in the last 20 years with the introduction of minimally invasive devices to measure inter alia stroke volume, cardiac output, depth of anaesthesia and cerebral and tissue oxygen monitoring. Despite these technological advances, peri-operative management of the high risk major surgery patient has remained virtually unchanged. The vast majority of patients undergo a pre-operative assessment which is neither designed to quantify functional capacity nor predict outcome. ⋯ It is perhaps not surprising that outcome still remains poor in high-risk patients.(1) In this review, we will briefly describe the role of peri-operative optimization, some of the available monitors and indicate how their combined use might be beneficial in managing the high-risk surgical patient. We believe that although there is now evidence to suggest that the use of individual new monitors (such as assessment of fluid status, depth of anaesthesia, tissue oxygenation and blood flow) can influence outcome, it will only be their combination that will radically improve the peri-operative management and outcome of high-risk surgical patients. It is a matter of some urgency that large scale, prospective and collaborative studies be designed, funded and executed to prove or disprove this hypothesis.