The American journal of cardiology
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention can be safely performed in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including those with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), and unstable angina. Although there remains debate about whether an aggressive strategy involving early coronary arteriography and revascularization should be routinely performed in patients who present with non-ST-segment elevation MI and unstable angina, recent clinical trials suggest that an aggressive approach should be taken in both intermediate- and high-risk patients with ACS. There have been 4 clinical trials that have compared the outcomes of patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina who were assigned to invasive or conservative strategies. ⋯ Event reductions were greatest in patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina at intermediate or high risk for an adverse outcome. Understanding that these subgroups comprise approximately 75% of patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina, we believe that an invasive approach is indicated in most patients who develop non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina. Regardless of the strategy used in ACS patients, lipid-lowering therapy is necessary to reduce recurrent ischemia events at the site of plaque instability and in atherosclerotic disease remote to the target lesion.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Impact of troponin T determinations on hospital resource utilization and costs in the evaluation of patients with suspected myocardial ischemia.
The evaluation and triage of patients with suspected myocardial ischemia in the emergency department remains challenging and costly. Previous studies of cardiac troponins have focused predominantly on patients with chest pain and have not randomized patients to different diagnostic strategies. Eight hundred fifty-six patients with suspected myocardial ischemia were prospectively randomized to receive a standard evaluation, including serial electrocardiographic and creatine phosphokinase-MB determinations (controls) or a standard evaluation with the addition of serial troponin T determinations (troponin group). ⋯ Total hospital charges were reduced in a similar fashion in troponin patients with and without acute coronary syndromes ($15,004 vs $19,202; p = 0.01, and $4,487 vs $6,187; p = 0.17, respectively) compared with controls. Troponin patients without acute coronary syndromes had fewer hospital admissions (25% vs 31%; p = 0.04), whereas troponin patients with acute coronary syndromes had shorter telemetry and coronary care unit lengths of stay (3.5 vs 4.5 days; p = 0.03) compared with controls. Thus, utilization of troponin T in a broad spectrum of emergency department patients with suspected myocardial ischemia improves hospital resource utilization and reduces costs.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Effects of omapatrilat on hemodynamics and safety in patients with heart failure.
Omapatrilat, a novel vasopeptidase inhibitor, is a highly potent and selective inhibitor of neutral endopeptidase and angiotensin-converting enzyme; its therapeutic potential is being investigated for treatment of hypertension and heart failure. In the present study, the safety, tolerability, and hemodynamic effects of single oral doses of omapatrilat (1 to 50 mg) are compared with placebo in patients with heart failure. Patients with heart failure (New York Heart Association functional class II to IV) and a resting left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40% were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential-panel study of single doses of omapatrilat of 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 25, or 50 mg, followed by hemodynamic assessment for 24 hours. ⋯ Additionally, by 2 hours after dosing with omapatrilat 25 and 50 mg, a trend in peak increases from baseline in plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (twofold) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (nearly twofold) was observed. Moreover, omapatrilat was well tolerated. Thus, omapatrilat administered orally to patients with heart failure was safe and well tolerated and resulted in improved hemodynamic performance.
-
Rapid, efficient, and accurate evaluation of chest pain patients in the emergency department optimizes patient care from public health, economic, and liability perspectives. To evaluate the performance of an accelerated critical pathway for patients with suspected coronary ischemia that utilizes clinical history, electrocardiographic findings, and triple cardiac marker testing (cardiac troponin I [cTnI], myoglobin, and creatine kinase-MB [CK-MB]), we performed an observational study of a chest pain critical pathway in the setting of a large Emergency Department at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in 1,285 consecutive patients with signs and symptoms of cardiac ischemia. The accelerated critical pathway for chest pain evaluation was analyzed for: (1) accuracy in triaging of patients within 90 minutes of presentation, (2) sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of cTnI, myoglobin, and CK-MB in diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (MI) within 90 minutes, and (3) impact on Coronary Care Unit (CCU) admissions. ⋯ CCU admissions decreased by 40%. Ninety percent of patients with negative cardiac markers and a negative electrocardiogram at 90 minutes were discharged home with 1 patient returning with an MI (0.2%) within the next 30 days. Thus, a simple, inexpensive, yet aggressive critical pathway that utilizes high-risk features from clinical history, electrocardiographic changes, and rapid point-of-care testing of 3 cardiac markers allows for accurate triaging of chest pain patients within 90 minutes of presenting to the emergency department.