Medical care
-
Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
A tool for judging coronary care unit admission appropriateness, valid for both real-time and retrospective use. A time-insensitive predictive instrument (TIPI) for acute cardiac ischemia: a multicenter study.
This study developed and tested a tool to assess the likelihood of patients having acute cardiac ischemia and thus the appropriateness of admitting them to the coronary care unit (CCU). It is valid both for real-time clinical use and for retrospective review: a time-insensitive predictive instrument (TIPI). The authors' earlier acute ischemia predictive instrument, not designed specifically to support retrospective use, could not offer the advantage of a single tool usable by both clinicians and reviewers of care. ⋯ This differentiation was maintained even for those given different (including inappropriate) triage to the CCU, ward, or home (P less than 0.0001 for each disposition). When the performance of the four TIPI-based risk groups was prospectively tested on year-two patients, among the 552 patients in the low probability group, only 1.6% had acute cardiac ischemia, including only 0.7% with acute infarctions. Among the 484 patients in the high probability group, 81.6% had acute ischemia, and 53.3% acute myocardial infarctions, suggesting these to be clinically relevant groups for aiding or assessing emergency room triage.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
-
The delivery of anesthesia services is at a crossroads in the United States. In 1967, there were two certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) for every anesthesiologist providing anesthetics, and the numbers are nearly equal today. A CRNA manpower forecasting model is developed in this article that shows CRNA supply and requirements from 1990 through 2010. ⋯ The results imply that more than a twofold increase in CRNA school enrollments is needed just to fill conservative baseline needs given the predicted growth in operations in all settings. Limiting anesthesiologists to a supervisory role, at the other extreme, would require a doubling of CRNAs by 2010 and an even greater expansion of CRNA schools. However, it is estimated that reversing CRNA manpower trends could save society between $750 million and $1.2 billion annually.