Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1994
Comparative StudyEvaluation of the Bullard laryngoscope using the new intubating stylet: comparison with conventional laryngoscopy.
The Bullard laryngoscope (BL) is a new device for managing the difficult airway. Previous publications on the BL are primarily descriptive, and fail to use internal controls (i.e., determine the best intubating mechanism) or external controls (i.e., compare the BL to a known standard such as conventional laryngoscopy). ⋯ Our results also suggest that the time to successful intubation with the BL using the intubating stylet was not affected by the conventional laryngoscopic grade; it was just as easy (and difficult) to intubate a conventional Grade I laryngoscopic view patient (full glottic view) as it was to intubate a conventional Grade III laryngoscopic view patient (visualization of just the epiglottis) with the BL. There were two failed intubations with the BL (3%) due to an inability to trap the epiglottis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialInduction and recovery characteristics and hemodynamic responses to sevoflurane and halothane in children.
The present study was designed to compare induction and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane and halothane anesthesia in children, and to assess the hemodynamic profile of both anesthetics during induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Thirty-four children (aged 9 mo-9 yr) scheduled for ambulatory surgery were allocated randomly to groups to receive either halothane (HALO, n = 17) or sevoflurane (SEVO, n = 17) in a mixture of O2 and N2O (40:60) for mask induction and maintenance of anesthesia. The inspired concentrations used for inhalation via a mask were increased every five breaths and were successively 1%, 2%, 3%, and 3.5% for HALO and 2%, 4%, 6%, and 7% for SEVO. ⋯ In the SEVO group, five children exhibited mild excitement, while in the HALO group, one mild laryngospasm and one transient cardiovascular deterioration were observed. In the SEVO group, a significant increase in heart rate (HR) was observed before tracheal intubation, but during maintenance of anesthesia HR and systolic arterial pressure (SAP) did not change compared to control values. In the HALO group, HR did not change throughout the study, whereas SAP remained significantly below control values throughout both induction and maintenance of anesthesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of ondansetron with ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
The purpose of this double-blind, randomized study was to compare the effectiveness of ondansetron plus saline versus ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Of 180 women having general anesthesia for major gynecologic surgery, 89 received intravenous ondansetron, 4 mg, plus saline (Group 1) and 91 received intravenous ondansetron, 4 mg, plus dexamethasone 8 mg (Group 2) during their operation. A complete response, defined as no emesis and no need for rescue antiemetic during the 24-h postoperative period, occurred in 38% of patients in Group 1 and in 52% in Group 2 (P = 0.048). ⋯ In the ondansetron plus dexamethasone group, 9 out of 10 patients who received propofol for induction of anesthesia had no emesis. The only failure occurred in a patient who had a single emetic episode during the 24th postoperative hour. The combination of ondansetron and dexamethasone was more effective than ondansetron and saline in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting for women having major gynecologic surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1994
Clinical TrialDeliberate hypotensive epidural anesthesia for patients with normal and low cardiac output.
The use of hypotensive anesthesia is contraindicated in patients with ventricular dysfunction, even though afterload reduction often improves ventricular performance. The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess systemic hemodynamic responses to deliberate hypotension with epidural anesthesia in patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction. Hemodynamic measurements were performed in 29 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty under deliberate hypotensive epidural anesthesia using low-dose intravenous epinephrine infusion to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 50-60 mm Hg. ⋯ During deliberate hypotension with epidural anesthesia, patients with a history of congestive heart failure or low preanesthetic CI (< or = 2.5 L.kg-1.m-2) increased their CI and SVI into the normal range. There were no significant perioperative complications in either of these groups. Hypotensive epidural anesthesia can be used successfully in patients with low cardiac output from ventricular dysfunction undergoing total hip arthroplasty.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialOndansetron prevents postoperative nausea and vomiting in women outpatients.
Three doses of intravenous (i.v.) ondansetron, 1 mg, 4 mg, and 8 mg, were compared to placebo for their antiemetic effect and safety. The drugs or placebo were administered in a double-blind manner, prophylactically to 589 women undergoing elective outpatient surgical procedures under nitrous oxide opioid-based general endotracheal anesthesia. In the postanesthesia care unit, the number of emetic episodes, periodic assessments of nausea severity using an 11-point scale (0 = no nausea; 10 = worst nausea), vital signs, and adverse events were collected by an independent observer for 2 h. ⋯ Heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and laboratory safety variables were not different among the groups. Ondansetron did not prolong awakening time. This study indicates that ondansetron is a safe and effective prophylactic antiemetic for women who have outpatient surgery under nitrous oxide opioid-based general anesthesia.