Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialInduction and recovery characteristics and hemodynamic responses to sevoflurane and halothane in children.
The present study was designed to compare induction and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane and halothane anesthesia in children, and to assess the hemodynamic profile of both anesthetics during induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Thirty-four children (aged 9 mo-9 yr) scheduled for ambulatory surgery were allocated randomly to groups to receive either halothane (HALO, n = 17) or sevoflurane (SEVO, n = 17) in a mixture of O2 and N2O (40:60) for mask induction and maintenance of anesthesia. The inspired concentrations used for inhalation via a mask were increased every five breaths and were successively 1%, 2%, 3%, and 3.5% for HALO and 2%, 4%, 6%, and 7% for SEVO. ⋯ In the SEVO group, five children exhibited mild excitement, while in the HALO group, one mild laryngospasm and one transient cardiovascular deterioration were observed. In the SEVO group, a significant increase in heart rate (HR) was observed before tracheal intubation, but during maintenance of anesthesia HR and systolic arterial pressure (SAP) did not change compared to control values. In the HALO group, HR did not change throughout the study, whereas SAP remained significantly below control values throughout both induction and maintenance of anesthesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of ondansetron with ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
The purpose of this double-blind, randomized study was to compare the effectiveness of ondansetron plus saline versus ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Of 180 women having general anesthesia for major gynecologic surgery, 89 received intravenous ondansetron, 4 mg, plus saline (Group 1) and 91 received intravenous ondansetron, 4 mg, plus dexamethasone 8 mg (Group 2) during their operation. A complete response, defined as no emesis and no need for rescue antiemetic during the 24-h postoperative period, occurred in 38% of patients in Group 1 and in 52% in Group 2 (P = 0.048). ⋯ In the ondansetron plus dexamethasone group, 9 out of 10 patients who received propofol for induction of anesthesia had no emesis. The only failure occurred in a patient who had a single emetic episode during the 24th postoperative hour. The combination of ondansetron and dexamethasone was more effective than ondansetron and saline in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting for women having major gynecologic surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialOndansetron prevents postoperative nausea and vomiting in women outpatients.
Three doses of intravenous (i.v.) ondansetron, 1 mg, 4 mg, and 8 mg, were compared to placebo for their antiemetic effect and safety. The drugs or placebo were administered in a double-blind manner, prophylactically to 589 women undergoing elective outpatient surgical procedures under nitrous oxide opioid-based general endotracheal anesthesia. In the postanesthesia care unit, the number of emetic episodes, periodic assessments of nausea severity using an 11-point scale (0 = no nausea; 10 = worst nausea), vital signs, and adverse events were collected by an independent observer for 2 h. ⋯ Heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and laboratory safety variables were not different among the groups. Ondansetron did not prolong awakening time. This study indicates that ondansetron is a safe and effective prophylactic antiemetic for women who have outpatient surgery under nitrous oxide opioid-based general anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSynergism between atracurium and mivacurium compared with that between vecuronium and mivacurium.
Synergism exists between some combinations of nondepolarizing muscle relaxants. To test the possibility of synergism between mivacurium and atracurium or vecuronium, 60 children anesthetized with propofol-alfentanil-N2O-O2 were randomized to one of five groups. Three groups of 10 patients each received an ED50 dose of a parent drug atracurium (A), vecuronium (V), or mivacurium (M), respectively, and two other groups of 15 patients each received a single-dose combination of atracurium with mivacurium (cAM) or vecuronium with mivacurium (cVM). ⋯ Maximum NMB established by combinations averaged 6.15 +/- 0.21 probits (87.5% NMB). The onset of maximum NMB for mivacurium was significantly faster compared to that for atracurium or for vecuronium (2.8 +/- 0.3 vs 5.7 +/- 0.4 or 4.0 +/- 0.3 min, respectively; P = 0.0001). Our results indicate that both drug combinations are synergistic even though only vecuronium is markedly different in its molecular structure from mivacurium.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of low-dose bupivacaine on postoperative epidural fentanyl analgesia and thrombelastography.
We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to determine the effect of bupivacaine on postoperative epidural fentanyl analgesia and thrombelastography in 120 patients who underwent extensive gastrointestinal or genitourinary surgery. The patients were randomized into four groups, 30 patients per group: Group I = epidural fentanyl (EF), 10 micrograms/mL in saline; Group II = EF with 0.1% bupivacaine; Group III = EF with 0.15% bupivacaine; and Group IV = EF with 0.2% bupivacaine. Pain relief was evaluated by a visual analog scale (VAS), both at rest and during coughing, and by a visual rating scale (VRS). ⋯ The VAS, VRS, sedation scores, changes in postoperative FVCs, and the incidence of side effects were not statistically different among the four groups. The 24-h total volumes of infusion in the four groups (146 +/- 40 mL, 140 +/- 38 mL, 142 +/- 40 mL, 124 +/- 21 mL, respectively) were not statistically different from each other. There were no significant differences in the TEG values [reaction time (R), coagulation time (K), angle (alpha), and maximum amplitude (mA)] among the four groups at anytime nor was there any difference between the baseline, PARR, and 24-h TEG values within any group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)