Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSynergism between atracurium and mivacurium compared with that between vecuronium and mivacurium.
Synergism exists between some combinations of nondepolarizing muscle relaxants. To test the possibility of synergism between mivacurium and atracurium or vecuronium, 60 children anesthetized with propofol-alfentanil-N2O-O2 were randomized to one of five groups. Three groups of 10 patients each received an ED50 dose of a parent drug atracurium (A), vecuronium (V), or mivacurium (M), respectively, and two other groups of 15 patients each received a single-dose combination of atracurium with mivacurium (cAM) or vecuronium with mivacurium (cVM). ⋯ Maximum NMB established by combinations averaged 6.15 +/- 0.21 probits (87.5% NMB). The onset of maximum NMB for mivacurium was significantly faster compared to that for atracurium or for vecuronium (2.8 +/- 0.3 vs 5.7 +/- 0.4 or 4.0 +/- 0.3 min, respectively; P = 0.0001). Our results indicate that both drug combinations are synergistic even though only vecuronium is markedly different in its molecular structure from mivacurium.
-
The swallowing reflex is depressed by anesthetics. During recovery from anesthesia the rapid return of laryngeal and upper airway reflexes is important to protect the lower airway from aspiration. This study measures the recovery of the swallowing reflex after propofol anesthesia. ⋯ The EMGi was significantly decreased over the first 12 min and returned to control at 21 min. Propofol depresses the swallowing reflex, but complete recovery is rapid. This study suggests that the oral intake could be allowed early after recovery from anesthesia when propofol is used as the sole anesthetic.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of ondansetron with ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
The purpose of this double-blind, randomized study was to compare the effectiveness of ondansetron plus saline versus ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Of 180 women having general anesthesia for major gynecologic surgery, 89 received intravenous ondansetron, 4 mg, plus saline (Group 1) and 91 received intravenous ondansetron, 4 mg, plus dexamethasone 8 mg (Group 2) during their operation. A complete response, defined as no emesis and no need for rescue antiemetic during the 24-h postoperative period, occurred in 38% of patients in Group 1 and in 52% in Group 2 (P = 0.048). ⋯ In the ondansetron plus dexamethasone group, 9 out of 10 patients who received propofol for induction of anesthesia had no emesis. The only failure occurred in a patient who had a single emetic episode during the 24th postoperative hour. The combination of ondansetron and dexamethasone was more effective than ondansetron and saline in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting for women having major gynecologic surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of low-dose bupivacaine on postoperative epidural fentanyl analgesia and thrombelastography.
We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to determine the effect of bupivacaine on postoperative epidural fentanyl analgesia and thrombelastography in 120 patients who underwent extensive gastrointestinal or genitourinary surgery. The patients were randomized into four groups, 30 patients per group: Group I = epidural fentanyl (EF), 10 micrograms/mL in saline; Group II = EF with 0.1% bupivacaine; Group III = EF with 0.15% bupivacaine; and Group IV = EF with 0.2% bupivacaine. Pain relief was evaluated by a visual analog scale (VAS), both at rest and during coughing, and by a visual rating scale (VRS). ⋯ The VAS, VRS, sedation scores, changes in postoperative FVCs, and the incidence of side effects were not statistically different among the four groups. The 24-h total volumes of infusion in the four groups (146 +/- 40 mL, 140 +/- 38 mL, 142 +/- 40 mL, 124 +/- 21 mL, respectively) were not statistically different from each other. There were no significant differences in the TEG values [reaction time (R), coagulation time (K), angle (alpha), and maximum amplitude (mA)] among the four groups at anytime nor was there any difference between the baseline, PARR, and 24-h TEG values within any group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1994
Clinical TrialDeliberate hypotensive epidural anesthesia for patients with normal and low cardiac output.
The use of hypotensive anesthesia is contraindicated in patients with ventricular dysfunction, even though afterload reduction often improves ventricular performance. The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess systemic hemodynamic responses to deliberate hypotension with epidural anesthesia in patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction. Hemodynamic measurements were performed in 29 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty under deliberate hypotensive epidural anesthesia using low-dose intravenous epinephrine infusion to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 50-60 mm Hg. ⋯ During deliberate hypotension with epidural anesthesia, patients with a history of congestive heart failure or low preanesthetic CI (< or = 2.5 L.kg-1.m-2) increased their CI and SVI into the normal range. There were no significant perioperative complications in either of these groups. Hypotensive epidural anesthesia can be used successfully in patients with low cardiac output from ventricular dysfunction undergoing total hip arthroplasty.