Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1997
Effects of inhaled nonimmobilizer, proconvulsant compounds on desflurane minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration in rats.
Anesthetics depress the central nervous system, whereas nonimmobilizers (previously called nonanesthetics) and transitional compounds having the same physical properties (e.g., solubility in lipid) do not produce anesthesia (nonimmobilizers) or are less potent anesthetics than might be predicted from their lipophilicity (transitional compounds). Potential explanations for the absent or decreased anesthetic effect of nonimmobilizer and transitional compounds include the theories that the nonimmobilizers are devoid of anesthetic effect and that transitional compounds have a decreased capacity to produce anesthesia; that the effects of these compounds are not apparent because the concentrations examined are too low; or that anesthesia, or lack thereof, results from a balance between depression and excitation (all nonimmobilizer and transitional compounds produce convulsions). To examine these issues further, we tested the effect of various multiples of the convulsive 50% effective dose (ED50) of three nonimmobilizers and one transitional compound on the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of desflurane in rats. The nonimmobilizer 2,3-dichlorooctafluorobutane (NI-1), from 0.7 to 1.1 times its convulsive ED50, increased the MAC of desflurane by 14%-27%, but at 1.6 times its convulsive ED50 caused no change in MAC; the nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (NI-2) did not change MAC at concentrations up to its convulsant ED50, but it increased MAC by 25% and 36% at 1.3 and 1.7 times its convulsant ED50, respectively. The nonimmobilizer flurothyl (NI-3) decreased the MAC of desflurane by 20% +/- 6% (mean +/- SD) at 0.5 times its convulsant ED50, but it caused no change at higher partial pressures (up to 7.8 times its convulsant ED50), and the transitional compound CF3CCl2-O-CF2Cl (T-1) significantly decreased MAC by 16% +/- 7% at 0.8 times its convulsant ED50, but the 6%-8% decreases in MAC at 0.4 and 1.6 times its convulsant ED50 were not significant. Thus, neither nonimmobilizer nor transitional compounds produced a consistent dose-related effect on the MAC of desflurane, and any changes were small. These results suggest that the excitation produced by transitional compounds or nonimmobilizers does not explain their limited ability or inability to produce anesthesia. The data are consistent with a decreased anesthetic efficacy of transitional compounds and the lack of efficacy of nonimmobilizers. ⋯ Inhaled compounds that do not cause anesthesia (nonimmobilizers) are used to test theories of anesthetic action. Their use presumes that a trivial explanation, such as cancelling stimulatory and depressant effects, does not explain the absence of anesthesia. The present results argue against such an explanation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1997
Quantitative differences in the production and toxicity of CF2=BrCl versus CH2F-O-C(=CF2)(CF3) (compound A): the safety of halothane does not indicate the safety of sevoflurane.
Carbon dioxide absorbents degrade both halothane and sevoflurane to toxic unsaturated compounds (CF2=CBrCl and CH2F-O-C[=CF2][CF3] [i.e., Compound A], respectively). Given the long history of safe administration of halothane, comparable toxicities of these degradation products would imply a similar safety of sevoflurane. We therefore examined CF2=CBrCl in the context of four issues relevant to previous studies of the toxicity of Compound A: 1) reactivity of the degradation product in vitro; 2) rate of its production in vitro; 3) its in vivo toxicity; 4) importance of the beta-lyase pathway to the toxicity in vivo. We found the following. 1) CF2=CBrCl is less reactive than Compound A, degrading in human serum albumin at one-fifth the rate of Compound A. 2) Over a 3-h period of "anesthesia," a standard circle system containing Baralyme (Allied Healthcare Products, Inc., St. Louis, MO) produces 30 times as much Compound A from a minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) concentration of sevoflurane as CF2=CBrCl from a MAC concentration of halothane; with soda lime, the difference is 60-fold. Correcting for differences in uptake of halothane versus sevoflurane decreases the differences to 20-40 times. 3) For a 3-h administration to rats, the partial pressure of Compound A causing minimal renal injury or necrosis of half the affected tubule cells exceeds the partial pressure of CF2=CBrCl causing minimal injury or necrosis of half the affected tubule cells by a factor of approximately 4-6. Thus, the ratio of production (Item 2 above) to the partial pressure causing injury with CF2=CBrCl is approximately a quarter of that ratio for Compound A. 4) Compounds that block the beta-lyase pathway either do not change (acivicin) or decrease (aminooxyacetic acid; AOAA) renal injury from CF2=CBrCl in rats, whereas these compounds increase (acivicin) or do not change (AOAA) injury from Compound A. We conclude that the safety of halothane cannot be used to support the safety of sevoflurane. ⋯ Carbon dioxide absorbents degrade halothane and sevoflurane to unsaturated compounds nephrotoxic to rats. Relative to sevoflurane's degradation product, halothane's degradation product has less toxicity relative to production, less reactivity, and a different mechanism of injury. The clinical absence of halothane nephrotoxicity does not necessarily indicate a similar absence for sevoflurane.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1997
The effects of isoflurane and halothane on left ventricular afterload in dogs with dilated cardiomyopathy.
The effects of volatile anesthetics, including isoflurane (ISO) and halothane (HAL), on determinants of left ventricular (LV) afterload have not been comprehensively described in experimental models of, or patients with, heart failure. We tested the hypothesis that ISO and HAL produce beneficial alterations in LV afterload when evaluated with aortic input impedance and interpreted using a three-element Windkessel model in dogs before and after development of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Hemodynamics and aortic pressure and blood flow waveforms were recorded in the conscious state and during 1.1- and 1.5-minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) ISO and HAL anesthesia on separate days in chronically instrumented dogs (n = 6). Dogs were then paced at 220-240 bpm for 20 +/- 3 days (mean = SEM) to develop cardiomyopathy, and the experiments were repeated after pacing had been temporarily discontinued. ISO decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP), mean aortic blood flow (MAQ), and total arterial resistance (R) and increased total arterial compliance (C) and characteristic aortic impedance (Zc) in dogs before pacing. HAL decreased MAP and MAQ and increased C but did not alter R and Zc. Chronic rapid LV pacing increased HR and LV end-diastolic pressure and decreased MAP, LV systolic pressure, and the peak rate of increase of LV pressure. MAQ, C, R, and Zc were unchanged. ISO and HAL decreased arterial pressure but did not affect C and Zc in the presence of LV dysfunction. HAL, but not ISO, increased R at 1.1 MAC, which indicates that this drug increases resistance to LV ejection. In contrast to findings in normal dogs, these results indicate that neither ISO nor HAL reduce arterial hydraulic resistance to LV ejection or favorably improve the rectifying properties of the aorta in dogs with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. ⋯ Isoflurane and halothane produce favorable alterations in the determinants of left ventricular afterload before, but not after, the production of experimental left ventricular dysfunction by sustained, rapid cardiac pacing in chronically instrumented dogs.