Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe effect of antiemetics on pupillary reflex dilation during epidural/general anesthesia.
The effect of dopamine D2 receptor antagonists, such as chlorpromazine and haloperidol, on pupil size in awake subjects suggests that these drugs might also alter pupillary reflex dilation and pupil size during general anesthesia. Forty-seven patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery under combined epidural/general anesthesia were randomized to receive one of the 5 following open labeled drugs: 10 mL saline, 0.13 mg/kg ondansetron, 0.25 mg/kg metoclopramide, 0.5 mg/kg metoclopramide, or 0.02 mg/kg droperidol. Three measurements of reflex dilation were taken at 5-min intervals and after the last measurement (time 0) the drug was administered. Measurements were then taken 5, 10, 20, and 40 min after I.V. drug administration. Reflex dilation was induced by intermittent noxious stimulation of the C5 dermatome with a tetanic electric current (60-70 mamp, 100 Hz, 3-s duration) after a stable level of epidural analgesia had been established with 3/8% bupivacaine and maintained with a continuous infusion. Metoclopramide produced a small decrease in pupil diameter and transiently depressed reflex dilation, whereas droperidol decreased pupil size at 10 min and depressed reflex dilation throughout the 40-min study period. Maximal change in reflex dilation was -6.6 +/- 3.3 mm-sec after droperidol. Ondansetron had no effect on pupil diameter or reflex dilation. When pupillary diameter measurements are used to gauge opioid levels during experimental conditions or during surgical anesthesia, antiemetic medication acting on the dopamine D2 receptor should be avoided. ⋯ Miosis is often considered an effect of opioid administration during general anesthesia, but other drugs, such as antiemetics, might produce a similar effect on the pupil. This study demonstrates that 2 antiemetics, droperidol and metoclopramide, constrict the pupil and block the pupillary dilation brought about by nociceptive stimuli.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialRopivacaine and fentanyl concentrations in patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: a volume-range study.
We enrolled nulliparous women in induced labor in a randomized study to determine whether increasing the concentration of the solution used in a patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) device was required as labor progressed. Patients were assigned to 6 groups (n = 25 in each group), receiving ropivacaine/fentanyl in concentrations of either 0.1%/0.5 microg/mL or 0.2%/1 microg/mL via a PCEA pump. Three groups received boluses of 12, 16, or 20 mL dilute solution in early labor (uterine contractions every 3 min and 4-cm cervical dilation) then 6, 8, and 10 mL concentrated solution in late labor. Three other groups received boluses of 12, 16, or 20 mL dilute solution during both periods. The lockout interval was 25 min. The primary outcome was time until the first request for staff-administered analgesia supplement. Hourly assessments included pain scores on a visual analog scale (VAS) graded from 0 to 10, satisfaction scores, arterial blood pressure, motor block intensity, and the upper sensory level of epidural anesthesia. Patients, midwives, and the observer were unaware of study solutions and PCEA settings. The maximum pain score was defined as the highest score experienced by each patient during each period. Duration of analgesia was defined as the time from the start of each period to the first injection of rescue analgesia and was compared using a survival analysis. There were no differences among the groups with regard to demographic and obstetric variables, arterial blood pressure, motor block intensity, upper sensory level, or satisfaction scores. At least 75% of the women rated their satisfaction as either good or excellent during each period. During late labor, the maximum pain score was lower in the group receiving 20 mL dilute solution compared with the group receiving 6 mL concentrated solution. Maximum pain score was not significantly different between 20 mL dilute solution and 10 mL concentrated solution (difference between VAS values = -0.4; 95% confidence limits, -1.599 and 0.799; P = 0.5055). During late labor, the duration of analgesia was longer in groups receiving 20 mL dilute solution (99 +/- 4 min) (mean +/- SD) than in those receiving 12 mL (77 +/- 30 min) and 16 mL (80 +/- 23 min). Duration of analgesia did not differ between groups receiving 20 mL and 10 mL (92 +/- 23 min) or between groups receiving 12 mL and 6 mL (78 +/- 30 min) of each respective solution. Duration of analgesia was longer in the groups receiving 8 mL concentrated solution (94 +/- 16 min) than in those receiving 16 mL dilute solution. We concluded that 0.1%/0.5 microg/mL ropivacaine/fentanyl was effective throughout labor when 20 mL was injected with each PCEA demand. With 16 mg ropivacaine and 8 microg fentanyl, the duration of analgesia was prolonged by doubling the concentration when labor became active. When 12 mg ropivacaine and 6 microg fentanyl were injected at each demand, analgesia was less satisfactory and doubling the concentration was not clinically effective. These results suggest that the effectiveness of PCEA is dependent on drug mass rather than the volume or concentration administered with each successful pump demand. ⋯ There is no clinical reason for increasing the concentration of the patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) solution when labor becomes active provided that an effective dose is already being administered with each demand. The quality of PCEA depends on the drug mass given with each demand rather than the concentration of the pump solution.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of intraoperative use of esmolol and nicardipine on recovery after ambulatory surgery.
There is controversy regarding the optimal technique for maintaining hemodynamic stability during anesthesia. We designed this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study to test the hypothesis that the technique used for maintaining hemodynamic stability during general anesthesia can influence recovery after ambulatory surgery. Forty-five healthy consenting women undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy procedures were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: Group 1 (control, n = 15) received normal saline 5 mL and 1 mL, followed by a saline infusion at a rate of 0.005 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1); Group 2 (n = 15) received esmolol 50 mg and saline 1 mL, followed by an esmolol infusion 5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1); and Group 3 (n = 15) received esmolol 50 mg and nicardipine 1 mg, followed by an esmolol infusion 5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). The study drugs were administered after the induction of anesthesia with fentanyl 1.5 microg/kg, and propofol 2 mg/kg I.V. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with vecuronium 0.12 mg/kg I.V. Anesthesia was initially maintained with desflurane 2% end-tidal and N(2)O 67% in oxygen in all 3 groups. During surgery, the mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was maintained within +/-15% of the baseline value by varying the study drug infusion rate and the inspired concentration of desflurane. In addition to MAP and heart rate values, electroencephalogram bispectral index values were recorded throughout the perioperative period. Recovery times and postoperative side effects were assessed. Compared with the control group, adjunctive use of esmolol and nicardipine attenuated the increase in heart rate (in Group 2) and MAP (in Group 3) after tracheal intubation. Furthermore, the use of an esmolol infusion as an adjunct to desflurane to control the acute autonomic responses during the maintenance period significantly decreased emergence times (4 +/- 2 versus 7 +/- 4 min), decreased the need for postoperative opioid analgesics (43% versus 80%), and reduced the time to discharge (209 +/- 89 versus 269 +/- 100 min). We conclude that the adjunctive use of esmolol alone or in combination with nicardipine during the induction of anesthesia reduced the hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. Furthermore, use of an esmolol infusion as an adjuvant to desflurane-N(2)O anesthesia for controlling the acute hemodynamic responses during the maintenance period improved the recovery profile after outpatient laparoscopic surgery. ⋯ The adjunctive use of the beta-adrenergic blocker esmolol to control the acute sympathetic responses during desflurane-based anesthesia provided a more rapid awakening from anesthesia, reduced the postoperative opioid analgesic requirement, and decreased the time to discharge home after ambulatory laparoscopic surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAutomatic "respirator/weaning" with adaptive support ventilation: the effect on duration of endotracheal intubation and patient management.
Adaptive support ventilation (ASV) provides an automatic adaptation of the ventilator settings to patient's passive and active respiratory mechanics. In a randomized controlled study, we evaluated automatic respiratory weaning in ASV for early tracheal extubation after cardiac surgery. Eligible patients were assigned to either an ASV protocol or a standard one consisting of synchronized intermittent ventilation followed by pressure support. Eighteen patients completed the ASV protocol, and 16 completed the standard one. There were no differences between groups in perioperative characteristics, lengths of tracheal intubation and intensive care unit stay, and ventilatory variables, except less peak inspiratory pressure during the initial phase in ASV (17.5 +/- 0.8 versus 22.2 +/- 0.8 cm H(2)O; P < 0.01). ASV patients required fewer ventilatory settings manipulations (2.4 +/- 0.7 versus 4.0 +/- 0.8 manipulations per patient; P < 0.05) and endured less high-inspiratory pressure alarms (0.7 +/- 2.4 versus 2.9 +/- 3.0; P < 0.05). These results suggest that in this specific population of patients, automation of postoperative ventilation with ASV resulted in an outcome similar to the control group. The internal logic of the new device resulted in less manipulation of the setting and alarms that could simplify respiratory management. ⋯ Adaptive support ventilation (ASV), a ventilatory mode providing automatic adjustment of the settings was compared with standard management for rapid tracheal extubation after cardiac surgery. The two approaches were equal in terms of outcome. In ASV, we observed fewer ventilator settings manipulations and a smaller amount of alarms, suggesting that this automatic mode may simplify postoperative respiratory management without delaying extubation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 2003
Validation of an original mathematical model of CO(2) elimination and dead space ventilation.
We present an original, mathematical model of ventilation and gas-exchange. Our aim was to validate it using data from previous clinical investigations, allowing our use of it in future investigations. The first previous investigation used a low-dead space, double-lumen, tracheal tube (DLT). We matched the model's PaCO(2) and airway pressures (P(AW)) to the patient mean during use of the DLT and a single-lumen tube (SLT). The model's resulting PaCO(2), PECO(2) and P(AW) were compared with the patients' as tidal volume (VT) changed with constant minute volume. The second investigation examined dead space during anesthesia. The model's VT, respiratory rate, CO(2) production, temperature, and alveolar and anatomical dead spaces were matched to each mechanically ventilated subject. Bias and precision in predictions of PaCO(2) and PECO(2) were calculated. The model's bias in prediction of dead space reduction by the DLT was 6.9%. Bias in prediction of P(AW) was 0.1% (peak) and -5.13% (mean), of PaCO(2) was 1.2% (DLT) and 1.5% (SLT) and of PECO(2) was 1.7% (DLT) and 1.3% (SLT). Prediction of PaCO(2) and PECO(2) in the second investigation (as 95% confidence interval of bias): PaCO(2) -2.6% to 0.8% and PECO(2) -4.9% to 1.2%. This validation allows future application of our model in appropriate theoretical investigations. ⋯ We present an original, mathematical model of ventilation and gas exchange. We validate it against previously published clinical data to allow its use in future theoretical investigations where data may be unavailable from patients.