Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2009
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyA comparison of cervical spine motion during orotracheal intubation with the trachlight(r) or the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope.
Tracheal intubation of an unstable cervical spine (c-spine) patient with the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) is thought to minimize c-spine movement but may be technically difficult in certain patients. Intubation using a luminous stylet, such as the Trachlight(R) (TL), also produces minimal motion of the c-spine and may be an interesting alternative technique for patients with an unstable c-spine. In this study, we compared the cervical motion caused by the TL and the FOB during intubation. ⋯ In patients under general anesthesia with neuromuscular blockade and manual in-line stabilization, we found no difference in the segmental c-spine motion produced during endotracheal intubation using the FOB and the TL.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2009
Randomized Controlled TrialA combination of electroencephalogram and auditory evoked potentials separates different levels of anesthesia in volunteers.
It has been shown that the combination of electroencephalogram (EEG) and auditory evoked potentials (AEP) allows a good separation of consciousness from unconsciousness. In the present study, we sought a combined EEG/AEP indicator that allows both separation of consciousness from unconsciousness and discrimination among different levels of sedation and hypnosis over a wider range of anesthesia. ⋯ These results show that with the new indicator presented here, a combination of EEG and AEP parameters can be used to differentiate degrees of anesthetic effects over a wide range of hypnosis, from the conscious state to deep anesthesia (i.e., BSP).
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2009
ReviewModern rapidly degradable hydroxyethyl starches: current concepts.
Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is a widely used plasma substitute for correcting perioperative hypovolemia. HES preparations are defined by concentration, molar substitution (MS), mean molecular weight (M(w)), the C(2)/C(6) ratio of substitution, the solvent, and the origin. The possible unwanted side effects of HES are anaphylactic reactions, alterations of hemostasis resulting in increased bleeding, kidney dysfunction, accumulation, and pruritus. ⋯ This review is focused on whether modern (third generation), more rapidly degradable HES preparations with a lower M(w) (130 kD) and a lower MS (<0.5) are safer and have fewer side effects. Several studies demonstrated that such modern HES preparations appear to be safe with regard to hemostasis, kidney function, itching, and accumulation. Modern HES preparations are dissolved in balanced, plasma-adapted solutions that no longer contain unphysiological amounts of sodium and chloride and are thus suitable for correcting hypovolemia.
-
Perioperative bleeding is a major challenge particularly because of increasing clinical use of potent antithrombotic drugs. Understanding current concepts of coagulation is important in determining the preoperative bleeding risk of patients, and in managing hemostatic therapy perioperatively. The serine protease thrombin plays pivotal roles in the activation of additional serine protease zymogens (inactive enzymatic precursors), cofactors, and cell-surface receptors. ⋯ However, a limitation of current treatment is that conventional clotting tests do not reflect the entire physiological processes of coagulation making optimal pharmacologic therapy difficult. Understanding the in vivo regulatory mechanisms and pharmacologic modulation of thrombin generation may help control bleeding without potentially increasing prothrombotic risks. In this review, we focus on the regulatory mechanisms of hemostasis and thrombin generation using multiple, simplified models of coagulation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2009
ReviewTranscatheter aortic valve implantation: anesthetic considerations.
Aortic valvular stenosis remains the most common debilitating valvular heart lesion. Despite the benefit of aortic valve (AV) replacement, many high-risk patients cannot tolerate surgery. AV implantation treats aortic stenosis without subjecting patients to sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and aorta cross-clamping. ⋯ Transcatheter AV implantation relies on intraoperative hemodynamic manipulation for success. Transfemoral and transapical approaches pose unique management challenges, but both require rapid ventricular pacing, the management of hypotension and arrhythmias during beating-heart valve implantation, and TEE. Anesthesiologists will care for debilitated patients with aortic stenosis receiving transcatheter AV implantation.