Cancer treatment reviews
-
Cancer treatment reviews · Feb 2010
ReviewSwitching from tamoxifen to aromatase inhibitors for adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer.
The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), including anastrozole, exemestane and letrozole, have demonstrated improved efficacy versus tamoxifen for the adjuvant endocrine treatment of postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. AIs can be used in several adjuvant endocrine settings: as upfront therapy, switch to an AI after 2-3years of tamoxifen or extended therapy following 5years of tamoxifen. In the switch setting, two different types of study designs have been utilized. ⋯ Similarly, early randomization studies, including the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group-8 and the Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 trial, have demonstrated the effectiveness of receiving an AI after tamoxifen. Two trials are assessing an early switch strategy versus upfront AI therapy: the BIG 1-98 trial and the ongoing Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multicentre trial are assessing switching from tamoxifen to an AI after 2-3years versus upfront AI therapy. This paper reviews studies that have investigated a switch strategy with AIs and considers the implications of these data on treatment choice for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
-
Cancer treatment reviews · Feb 2010
ReviewCombined treatment strategies in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) after imatinib and sunitinib therapy.
Resistance to tyrosine-kinase inhibitors remains an open issue in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. The complex biology of disease in the multi-resistant setting has led a progressively growing urgency and interest in development combined or integrated therapies. This mini-review outlines the rationale for developing new combined therapeutic approaches, and describes the state of the art of the various potential strategies and the promising research perspectives.
-
Cancer treatment reviews · Dec 2009
Review Comparative StudyQuality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology--a systematic review.
To ensure evidence-based decision making in pediatric oncology systematic reviews are necessary. The objective of our study was to evaluate the methodological quality of all currently existing systematic reviews in pediatric oncology. ⋯ Most systematic reviews in the field of pediatric oncology seem to have serious methodological flaws leading to a high risk of bias. While Cochrane systematic reviews were of higher methodological quality than systematic reviews in regular journals, some of them also had methodological problems. Therefore, the methodology of each individual systematic review should be scrutinized before accepting its results.
-
Trastuzumab (Herceptin), a monoclonal antibody against HER2 has established itself as the treatment paradigm of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. Its success, however, has been tempered by its sequelae. In particular, most tumours become resistant to trastuzumab through a variety of mechanisms. ⋯ Trial results suggest it may be of considerable benefit to patients with trastuzumab-resistant tumours and may play a role in the reduction of CNS relapses. In addition, lapatinib is well-tolerated and unlike trastuzumab, minimal cardiac dysfunction has been documented. A number of trials are underway to assess whether lapatinib will oust trastuzumab from its pole position in the management of HER2-positive breast cancer or whether their combination will prove to be superior to either therapy alone.