Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
-
Ann R Coll Surg Engl · Jul 2011
ReviewThe use and effectiveness of cadaveric workshops in higher surgical training: a systematic review.
The aim of this systematic review is to describe the use of cadavers in postgraduate surgical training, to determine the effect of cadaveric training sessions on surgical trainees' technical skills performance and to determine how trainees perceive the use of cadaveric workshops as a training tool. ⋯ Evidence for the effectiveness of cadaveric workshops in surgical training is currently limited. In particular, there is little research into how these workshops improve the performance of surgical trainees during subsequent live surgery. However, both trainees and assessors hold them in high regard and feel they help to improve operative skills. Further research into the role of cadaveric workshops is required.
-
Ann R Coll Surg Engl · Jul 2011
Case ReportsA new recreational mechanism for the boxer's knuckle: cause for concern?
Traumatic injuries of the metacarpophalangeal joints are a common occurrence in professional and recreational sports such as boxing and martial arts, especially the fourth and fifth metacarpals. Injury usually results from a forceful impact with a clenched fist. The spectrum of injuries varies from simple skin laceration to extensor mechanism disruption, dorsal capsule rupture, metacarpal fractures and carpometacarpal joint injuries. ⋯ We report on two patients sustaining similar injuries to the dorsum of the hand but following punching of a recreational 'punching machine'. We describe the patterns of injury encountered and summarise the treatment. For clinical and safety reasons as well as the potential medicolegal implications, we believe it is important to highlight this mechanism of injury.
-
Ann R Coll Surg Engl · Jul 2011
Patients' misunderstanding of common orthopaedic terminology: the need for clarity.
Patients' understanding of their medical problems is essential to allow them to make competent decisions, comply with treatment and enable recovery. We investigated patients' understanding of orthopaedic terms to identify those words surgeons should make the most effort to explain. ⋯ Care should be taken by surgeons when using basic and common orthopaedic terminology in order to avoid misunderstanding. Educating patients in clinic is a routine part of practice.
-
Ann R Coll Surg Engl · Jul 2011
Comparative StudyIntraoperative cell salvage versus postoperative autologous blood transfusion in hip arthroplasty: a retrospective service evaluation.
A number of ways of reducing blood loss in arthroplasty have been explored, including preoperative autologous transfusion, intraoperative cell salvage and postoperative autologous transfusions. Both intraoperative blood salvage and postoperative retransfusion drains have been shown to be effective in reducing blood loss in total hip arthroplasty. In our department there was a change in practice from using postoperative retransfusion drains to intraoperative cell salvage. To our knowledge no study has directly compared using intraoperative blood salvage and postoperative retransfusion drains alone in total hip arthroplasty. ⋯ We feel that intraoperative cell salvage provides a more efficient method of reducing blood loss than postoperative retransfusion in primary total hip replacement. A prospective randomised study would be useful to ascertain any clinical difference between the two methods.
-
Deciding to operate on high risk patients suffering catastrophic surgical emergencies can be problematic. Patients are frequently classed as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 5 and, as a result, aggressive but potentially lifesaving intervention is withheld. The aim of our study was to review the short-term outcomes in patients who were classed as ASA grade 5 but subsequently underwent surgery despite this and to compare the ASA scoring model to other predictors of surgical outcome. ⋯ In times of an ageing population, the number of patients suffering catastrophic surgical events will increase. Intervention, with little hope of a cure, a return to independent living or an acceptable quality of life, leads to unnecessary end-of-life suffering for patients and their relatives, and consumes sparse resources. The accuracy and reliability of ASA grade 5 as an outcome predictor has been questioned. P POSSUM and APACHE II scoring systems are significantly better predictors of outcome and should be used more frequently to aid surgical decision-making in high risk patients.