Pain
-
N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists have been shown to block the development of antinociceptive tolerance to morphine. Assessment of the effects of NMDA antagonists on development of antinociceptive tolerance to selective opioid mu (mu) and delta (delta) agonists, however, has not been reported. In these experiments, selective mu and delta receptor agonists, and morphine, were repeatedly administered to mice either supraspinally (i.c.v.) or systemically (s.c.), alone or after pretreatment with systemic NMDA antagonists. ⋯ Further, MK801 pretreatment also did not affect the development of tolerance to the antinociception resulting from a cold-water swim-stress episode, previously shown to be a delta-opioid mediated effect. These data lead to the suggestion that the mechanisms of tolerance to receptor selective mu and delta opioids may be regulated differently from those associated with morphine. Additionally, these findings emphasize that conclusions reached with studies employing morphine cannot always be extended to 'opiates' in general.
-
The objective of this study was to review the effectiveness and safety of antidepressants in neuropathic pain. In a systematic review of randomised controlled trials, the main outcomes were global judgements, pain relief or fall in pain intensity which approximated to more than 50% pain relief, and information about minor and major adverse effects. Dichotomous data for effectiveness and adverse effects were analysed using odds ratio and number needed-to-treat (NNT) methods. ⋯ Compared with placebo, of 100 patients with neuropathic pain who are given antidepressants, 30 will obtain more than 50% pain relief, 30 will have minor adverse reactions and four will have to stop treatment because of major adverse effects. With very similar results for anticonvulsants it is still unclear which drug class should be first choice. Treatment would be improved if we could harness the dramatic improvement seen on placebo in some of the trials.
-
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Effect of present pain and mood on the memory of past postoperative pain in women treated surgically for breast cancer.
In our recent retrospective study on breast cancer patients, the intensity of the past postoperative pain was a primary factor in predisposing the development of chronic post-treatment pain. The present prospective study was designed to find out if the remembered intensity of postoperative pain (RIPP) after breast surgery was influenced by the development of chronic pain and if the RIPP had any correlation with the development of depression or anxiety. The patient's estimation of the severity of the RIPP was determined three times in the year after surgery. ⋯ Their depression remained at a higher level during the first year after surgery. The results suggest that the amount of postoperative pain may play a role in the development of chronic pain. However, the development of chronic pain is connected to a tendency to overestimate previous pain and to higher levels of depression.
-
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Development and preliminary validation of a postoperative pain measure for parents.
Parents are now primarily responsible for the at home assessment and treatment of their children's pain following minor surgery. Although some research has suggested that parents underestimate their children's pain following surgery, no behavioral measure exists to assist parents in pain assessment. The Postoperative Pain Measure for Parents was developed based on cues parents reported using to assess their children's pain (e.g. changes in appetite, activity level). ⋯ This study provides preliminary evidence for the use of the Postoperative Pain Measure for Parents as a valid assessment tool with children between the ages of 7-12 years following day surgery. It is internally consistent and strongly related to child-rated pain. Future research should explore the use of this measure with a younger sample and children with developmental delays.
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Clinical analgesic equivalence for morphine and hydromorphone with prolonged PCA.
A morphine to hydromorphone equivalence ratio of 7:1 has become the accepted standard, but evidence supporting it comes from single dose studies performed before the advent of patient controlled analgesia (PCA). We compared morphine and hydromorphone use with PCA in bone marrow transplantation patients who required opioids for the control of severe oral mucositis over several days or weeks. An exploratory analysis of clinical records from 102 patients (981 patient days) who used PCA opioids for varying periods of up to 50 days suggested a morphine to hydromorphone use ratio of 3:1. ⋯ Thirty-six patients who used morphine and 21 who used hydromorphone contributed data on pain, satisfaction with pain control, and drug consumption. We observed an average morphine/hydromorphone ratio of 3:1. This differs markedly from historical single dose studies used in published dose equivalency recommendations implying that other equivalency ratios in clinical use may be inappropriate.