Pain
-
Multicenter Study
Development and internal validation of a clinical risk tool to predict chronic postsurgical pain in adults: a prospective multicentre cohort study.
Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a highly prevalent condition. To improve CPSP management, we aimed to develop and internally validate generalizable point-of-care risk tools for preoperative and postoperative prediction of CPSP 3 months after surgery. A multicentre, prospective, cohort study in adult patients undergoing elective surgery was conducted between May 2021 and May 2023. ⋯ These models demonstrated good calibration and clinical utility. The primary CPSP model demonstrated fair predictive performance including 2 significant predictors. Derivation of a generalizable risk tool with point-of-care predictors was possible for the threshold-based CPSP models but requires independent validation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Extended reality used in the treatment of phantom limb pain: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
Phantom limb pain (PLP) represents a significant challenge after amputation. This study investigated the use of phantom motor execution (PME) and phantom motor imagery (PMI) facilitated by extended reality (XR) for the treatment of PLP. Both treatments used XR, but PME involved overt execution of phantom movements, relying on the decoding of motor intent using machine learning to enable real-time control in XR. ⋯ Pain reduction for PME was larger than previously reported. Despite our initial hypothesis not being confirmed, PME and PMI, aided by XR, are likely to offer meaningful PLP relief to most patients. These findings merit consideration of these therapies as viable treatment options and alternatives to pharmacological treatments.
-
Multicenter Study Observational Study
Phenotyping peripheral neuropathies with and without pruritus: a cross-sectional multicenter study.
Pruritus often escapes physicians' attention in patients with peripheral neuropathy (PNP). Here we aimed to characterize neuropathic pruritus in a cohort of 191 patients with PNP (large, mixed, or small fiber) and 57 control subjects with deep phenotyping in a multicenter cross-sectional observational study at 3 German sites. All participants underwent thorough neurological examination, nerve conduction studies, quantitative sensory testing, and skin biopsies to assess intraepidermal nerve fiber density. ⋯ The pruritus group had lower intraepidermal nerve fiber density at the thigh, concomitant with a more proximal distribution of symptoms compared with the other PNP groups. Stratification of patients with PNP by using cross-sectional datasets and multinominal logistic regression analysis revealed distinct patterns for the patient groups. Together, our study sheds light on the presence of neuropathic pruritus in patients with PNP and its relationship with neuropathic pain, outlines the sensory and structural abnormalities associated with neuropathic pruritus, and highlights its impact on anxiety levels.
-
Multicenter Study
What is associated with painful polyneuropathy? A cross-sectional analysis of symptoms and signs in patients with painful and painless polyneuropathy.
It is still unclear how and why some patients develop painful and others painless polyneuropathy. The aim of this study was to identify multiple factors associated with painful polyneuropathies (NeuP). A total of 1181 patients of the multicenter DOLORISK database with painful (probable or definite NeuP) or painless (unlikely NeuP) probable or confirmed neuropathy were investigated clinically, with questionnaires and quantitative sensory testing. ⋯ Multivariate logistic regression archived an accuracy above 78%, random forest of 76%; thus, almost 4 out of 5 subjects can be classified correctly. This multicenter analysis shows that pain-related worrying, emotional well-being, and clinical phenotype are factors associated with painful (vs painless) neuropathy. Results may help in the future to identify patients at risk of developing painful neuropathy and identify consequences of pain in longitudinal studies.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Efficacy of naproxen in patients with sciatica: multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
This trial assessed the efficacy of naproxen in patients with sciatica in outpatient clinics across 4 Norwegian hospitals. A total of 123 adults with radiating pain below the knee (≥4 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale) and signs consistent with nerve root involvement were included. Participants were randomized to receive either naproxen 500 mg or a placebo twice daily for 10 days. ⋯ No differences were found for sciatica bothersomeness or consumption of rescue medication or opioids. Participants in the naproxen group exhibited an adjusted odds ratio of 4.7 (95% CI 1.3-16.2) for improvement by 1 level on the global perceived change scale. In conclusion, naproxen treatment showed small, likely clinically unimportant benefits compared with placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe sciatica.