Pain
-
Low Back Pain Rating scale is an index scale which includes measurements of pain intensity, disability, and physical impairment. The scale was designed to monitor the outcome of clinical trials of low back pain treatment. It has been validated in 58 patients following first-time discectomy. ⋯ In the study, a high rater agreement (97.7%) was found without level difference between two observers using the scale. The validation process included: construct validity, criterion-related validity and item bias, relative to Global Assessments pronounced by the patient and an experienced clinician. Low Back Pain Rating scale hs been shown to be valid and reliable in the assessment of low back pain.
-
The health care system has moved towards home care, early discharge, and day procedures. Parents in the home are, therefore, far more likely to be managing their children's postoperative pain than health professionals. The purpose of this study was to describe mothers' experiences in identifying and managing their children's acute pain associated with surgery. ⋯ A purposive, convenience sample of 7 mothers whose children were 4-8 years old and who had a day-surgery adenoid-tonsillectomy were interviewed in depth (2-3 interviews per mother). Four themes were found in the data: (1) mothers' descriptions of their children's overall pattern of postoperative pain indicated that pain was minimal or absent before surgery, increased following surgery, and decreased with medicine and healing; (2) mothers' assessment and evaluation of their children's pain used pain cues similar to those used by nurses and physicians; (3) all the mothers worried about drug addiction; and 4) mothers learned to manage their children's pain through 'trial and error'. This study provides beginning data for understanding family management of children's pain.
-
A consecutive sample of 53 chronic cancer pain patients were administered 5 different pain intensity scales: a visual analogue scale (VAS), a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10 (NRS), a verbal rating scale (VRS), the Italian Pain Questionnaire (Italian version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire) (PRI), and the Integrated Pain Score (IPS) which is an instrument designed at the Pain Therapy and Palliative Care Division of the National Cancer Institute of Milan to integrate pain intensity and duration in a single measure. These scales were administered before and after a definite therapy change. ⋯ A single factor clearly emerged explaining most of the different scales variability. A logistic regression analysis showed that VAS, NRS, VRS were more strongly associated with IRS than PRI and IPS.
-
Comparative Study
Heterotopic nociceptive conditioning stimuli and mental task modulate differently the perception and physiological correlates of short CO2 laser stimuli.
The present study was aimed at examining the specificity of the action of heterotopic nociceptive conditioning stimulation (HNCS) by comparing its effects of those induced by a mental task (MT). Five test stimuli made from short CO2 laser pulses (duration: 40 msec; diameter: 10 mm; intensity: 0.25-0.8 Joules) were delivered every 30 to 45 sec at random to 4 different spots on the skin of the upper lip in 3 groups of 10 healthy subjects. The two most intense stimuli were perceived as painful, the two least intense stimuli as warm, and the intermediate stimulus as hot or near painful. ⋯ Pain perception (first pain) threshold was increased in both conditioning stimulations; however, the stimulus-response curve and the neurophysiological correlates were differently affected. During HNCS, the stimulus-response curve was depressed and T was increased mainly for the intermediate stimulus, whilst CEP power density was reduced for all stimulus intensities; discrimination performance near pain threshold was dramatically depressed. During MT, the stimulus-response curve was shifted down toward higher stimulus intensities, T was equally increased for all stimulus intensities, whereas CEP power density was not changed; discrimination performance remained unchanged.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Recent investigations have shown that non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may exert an antinociceptive effect when administered at or within the central nervous system (CNS). This might be due to the engagement of CNS substrates that support the analgesic effects of opiates, including the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) and the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM). The off- and on-cells of the RVM have been proposed to inhibit and facilitate, respectively, nociceptive transmission. ⋯ Neuronal response and TF retained their mutual time relationship but shifted pari passu toward longer latencies. This antinociception was apparent already 5 min post-injection and reached a maximum in 50-60 min for i.v. administration and 30-35 min for PAG microinjection. These results confirm other authors' findings of the direct antinociceptive action of NSAIDs upon PAG, and provide the first evidence for a plausible involvement of RVM off- and on-cells in such antinociceptive effect.