Spine
-
Retrospective review. ⋯ Patients who both matched Roussouly sagittal spinal type and improved in SRS-Schwab modifiers had superior patient-reported outcomes. Utilizing both classification systems in surgical decision-making can optimize postop outcomes.Level of Evidence: 3.
-
A retrospective cohort study. ⋯ The recurrence-prediction models for PVO created only using the initial risk factors showed low sensitivity, regardless of statistical method. However, ANN models using time-series data of CRP values and their ensemble model showed considerably increased prediction power. Therefore, clinicians treating PVO patients should pay attention to the treatment response including changes of CRP levels to identify high-risk patients for recurrence, and further studies to develop recurrence-prediction model for PVO should focus on the treatment response rather than initial risk factors.Level of Evidence: 4.
-
Retrospective observational study of a cohort of consecutive patients. ⋯ This next-generation minimally invasive anterior and posterior combined surgery was found to be a safe and useful procedure for OVF treatment to reduce correction loss, mechanical complication, and AVF, resulting in less postoperative low back pain.Level of Evidence: 3.
-
Observational Study
Factors Affecting Pedicle Screw Insertional Torque in Spine Deformity Surgery.
Retrospective observational study of consecutive patients. ⋯ We propose the concept of an optimal S/P ratio for obtaining rigid pedicle screw fixation during spinal corrective surgery, which is different for patients with ASD and patients with AIS. The S/P ratio is useful for deciding the appropriate diameter screw for each case in preoperative planning.Level of Evidence: 4.
-
Retrospective analysis of administrative billing data. ⋯ A metric of serious complications was unreliable for benchmarking cervical fusion outcomes and only modestly reliable for thoracolumbar fusion. When assessed using administrative datasets, these measures appear inappropriate for high-stakes applications, such as public reporting or pay-for-performance.Level of Evidence: 3.